نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 کارشناس ارشد حقوق بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه حقوق عمومی و بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.
3 استادیار گروه حقوق عمومی و بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Article 2 (1) of the European Convention on Human Rights, while recognizing the right to life, prohibits deliberately depriving people of this right. However, paragraph 2 of this article refers to the use of force by law enforcement and military agents of state in defence of any person from unlawful violence, in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained and in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection that leads to the unwanted death of a person or persons is not against the right to life. The European Court of Human Rights, while confirming these three cases, in the light of paragraph 2 of Article 15 of the Convention, has also declared deaths resulting from lawful acts of war, as an exception to the right to life. This article, based on the descriptive-analytical method, while examining these 4 situations, answers the question, under what conditions is it possible to derogate the right to life in these cases? This article concludes that in the light of the interpretation of the convention and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, the violation of the right to life in the four situations will not be absolute, and while the use of force in these cases must be absolutely necessary and unavoidable. Several conditions must be met in the stages before, during and after the use of force. Such a matter basically shows the approach of the court to guarantee the maximum right to life and limit the deviation from it to very exceptional cases, which naturally conforms to the provisions of the convention and its governing spirit.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)