مطالعه تطبیقی الزامات حقوقی طراحی قراردادهای هوشمند دیجیتالی در حقوق ایران و فرانسه

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای حقوق خصوصی، گروه حقوق، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران.

2 استادیار حقوق خصوصی، گروه حقوق، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران.

3 استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه مفید، قم، ایران.

چکیده

در دهه اخیر، ترکیب فناوری پایگاه داده توزیع‌ شده موسوم به بلاک‌چین و قراردادهای دیجیتالی، منجر به ابداع شکل مدرن قراردادهای هوشمند شده است. در واقع قرارداد هوشمند، نرم‌افزار رایانه‌ای با قابلیت خوداجرایی است. رفع مشکل نقض تعهدات به‌ویژه بین متعاملین ناشناس در عرصه بین‌المللی، کاهش لزوم مراجعه به دادگاه‌ها، حذف عمده مداخلات انسانی در تأیید و اجرای مفاد قرارداد از دستاوردهای این ابتکار است. حال این‌ سوال مطرح می‌شود که علاوه بر شرایط اساسی عقود که در ماده 190 قانون مدنی آمده، رعایت کدام ضوابط حقوقی در طراحی این نوع قراردادها به‌خصوص جهت حمایت از عموم افراد غیر‌حقوقدان جامعه الزامی است؟ در پژوهش حاضر که با روش توصیفی – تحلیلی انجام شده، تحولات اخیر قانون مدنی فرانسه در راستای تنظیم مقررات ویژه قراردادهای الکترونیکی در تطبیق با حقوق ایران مطالعه شده است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد به‌دلیل عدم انطباق کامل ماهیت قراردادهای هوشمند با قراردادهای الکترونیکی حقوقی رایج، ممکن است برخی از ضوابط مهم حقوقی نظیر رفتار با حسن‌نیت و تعهد به آگاهی کامل متعاملین از مفاد قرارداد، در این‌گونه قراردادها نقض شود. ضمن اینکه احتمال اختلال در معیارهای شخصی یا ذهنی حاکم بر صحت معاملات مانند رضایت بر انعقاد قرارداد در نمایندگی الکترونیکی وجود دارد. نتیجه اینکه مستفاد از قاعده فقهی استیمار، حداکثر اختیار نماینده الکترونیکی، ارائه مشاوره در انعقاد عقد است و اراده اشخاص را نمی‌توان مغلوب الگوریتم‌های از پیش تعیین شده رایانه دانست. لذا راه‌حل پیشنهادی به منظور ظهور اراده طرفین، استفاده از قراردادهای هوشمند ترکیبی(کد و متن) است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A comparative study of the legal requirements for designing digital smart contracts In Iranian and French law

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mojtaba Dehghani Tafti 1
  • Marzieh Afzali Mehr 2
  • Rabia Eskini 3
1 PhD student in Private Law, Department of Law, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Private Law, Department of Law, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Mofid University, Qom, Iran.
چکیده [English]

In the last decade, the combination of blockchain, distributed ledger technology, and digital contracts has led to the invention of the modern form of smart contracts. In fact, smart contract is a self-executing computer software. Resolving the problem of breaches of obligations-especially among anonymous interlocutors in the international arena-, reducing the need to physically go to the court, eliminating major human interventions in the ratification and implementation of the provisions of the contract are some of the achievements of this initiative. One question which is raised is that in addition to the basic conditions of contracts mentioned in Article 190 of the Civil Code, ‘what legal rules are required in the design of such contracts, especially to protect the public non-legal entities?’ The present study was done by descriptive-analytical method to investigate the recent developments of French civil law in order to regulate special provisions of electronic contracts in compliance with Iranian law. Findings show that due to the inconsistency of the nature of smart contracts with current electronic legal contracts, some important legal rules such as good behavior and commitment of the parties to the full knowledge of the provisions of the contract may be violated in such contracts. In addition, there is a possibility of violation of personal or mental criteria governing the correctness of transactions, such as consent to conclude a contract in the electronic agency. As a result, using the jurisprudential rule of Estimar, the maximum authority of the electronic representative is to provide advice in concluding a contract, and the will of individuals cannot be considered as defeated by predetermined computer algorithms. Therefore, the proposed solution in order to express the full will of parties is to use smart combined contracts (code and text).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hybrid smart contract
  • blockchain
  • France
  • Estimar rule
  • Negotiation

مراجع

  • Amini, Mansoor, Ebrahimi,Yahya. (2011). “Goodwill in Contracts From Theory to Practice, A Look at the Issue in the Commonwealth Legal System” . Journal of Comparative Law. Volume 2 number 2. pp:23-43.(In Persian)
  • Ancel, Bruno. (2018). "Les smart contracts : révolution sociétale ou nouvelle boîte de Pandore ? Regard comparatiste". COMMUNICATION - COMMERCE ÉLECTRONIQUE,15-18.
  • Ansari, Sheikh (2014), Description of achievements (Makaseb) (Mohammad Masoud Abbasi) ( Volumes 4 and 9), Qom: Dar al-Alam. (In Persian)
  • Benzler, Marc. (2018). "Smart Contracts: Legal Framework and Proposed Guidelines for Lawmaker". European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 1-52.
  • Carbonnier, J. (1990). Droit Civil - 4. Les Obligations. Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Cutts, Tatiana.  (2019). "Smart Contracts and Consumers" . Law Society and Economy Working Papers,1-52.
  • DE CARI, Riccardo.(2019) "The Legal Meaning of Smart Contracts " , European Review of Private Law. 731-752.
  • De Graaf, T.J. (2019). "From old to new: From internet to smart contracts and from people to smart contracts", computer law & security review, ELSEVIER, 35, 423-433.
  • Dehghani Tafti, M., Afzali mehr, M., Eskini, R. (2021). “A Comparative Study of the Law Governing Smart Digital Contracts from the Perspective of Private International Law in the Iranian Legal System and the Regulations of Rome I”. Modern Technologies Law, 2(2), 203-225. (In Persian)
  • Dell'Erba, Marco. (2018). "Demystifying Technology. Do Smart Contracts Require a New Legal Framework? Regulatory Fragmentation, Self-Regulation, Public Regulation" (May 17, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3228445 .PP:1-49.
  • Earls, Jordan & et. (2018), " Smart contract: is the law readu?" prepared by: smart contracts alliancean initiative of the chamber of digital commerceseptember, 1-62.
  • Eskini, Rabia. (2009). Commercial Law, Commercial Companies (Vol. II). Tehran: Samt. (In Persian)
  • Fries , Martin. (2018). "Private Law Compliance Through Smart Contracts?", The Journal of compliance in health care: JCHC, November, available at:<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328872976 >.
  • Giancaspro, Mark. (2017). "Is a ‘smart contract’ really a smart idea? Insights from a legal perspective". computer law & security review, ELSEVIER, 33 ,825-835.
  • Gilcrest, Jack & Carvalho, Arthur. (2018). " Smart Contracts: Legal Considerations", Miami University Oxford, Ohio, USA, 1-5.
  • Governatori, Guido (2018)." On legal contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and block chain systems", Springer Nature .
  • Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar. (2003). Higher philosophy in law. Tehran: Ganj-e-Danesh Library. (In Persian)
  • Janssen, Andre. (2021). "Smart Contracting And The New Digital
    Directives : Some Initial Thoughts", Journal of JIPITEC, 12, 196-203.
  • Katouzian, Nasser. (2009). General Rules of Contracts (Vol. I). Tehran: Anteshar Co. (In Persian)
  • Katouzian, Nasser. (2013). Abbaszadeh, Mohammad Hadi, (2013). Goodwill in Iranian Law , Law Quarterly, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran. . Volume 43 number 3. Pp: 167-186. (In Persian)
  • Madir, Jelena. (2018). "Smart Contracts: (How) Do They Fit Under Existing Legal Frameworks?". Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3301463or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3301463, 1-18.
  • Mafi, Homayoun and Nasser, Mehdi. (2021). Analysis of the mechanism of qualification of interlocutors in the implementation of smart contracts in Iranian law. Journal of Commerce. Volume 98. Pp: 279-320. (In Persian)
  • Makarem Shirazi, Nasser. (2018). Lessons outside of jurisprudence on the subject of options (Historian:1.9). https://www.eshia.ir/feqh/archive/text/makarem/feqh/96/961019/. Last visit: 2022.2.26. (In Persian)
  • Maynard, Trevor. (2019), "Triggering Innovation How Smart Contracts Bring Policies to Life". Emerging Risks Report , Queen Mary university of London center of commercial Law studies, 1-47.
  • Sadiku, M. N. O., Eze, K. G., & Musa, S. M. (2018). “Smart Contracts: A Prime”. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 5(5),538-541.
  • Meyer, Olaf. (2020). Stopping the Unstoppable Termination and Unwinding of Smart Contracts, Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 1-15.
  • Mohaghegh Damad, Seyed Mostafa; Maghsoudi, Reza & et. (2021). Unauthorized conditions for the validity of a condition in civil law. Quarterly Journal of the Teachings of Civil Jurisprudence. Volume 24 number 3. Pp:313-340. (In Persian)
  • Nasser, Mehdi. (2018). Smart Contracts (Comparative Study of Iranian and American Law). Tehran: Majd. (In Persian)
  • Obellianne, Stephan. (2009). Les sources des obligations. Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille.
  • Philippe, Denis. (2019). "BLOCKCHAIN AND SMART CONTRACT: LEX CRYPTOGRAPHIA? " available  at: https://www.interleges.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/BLOCKCHAIN-AND-SMART-CONTRACT.
  • Rashvand Bukani, Mehdi, Nasser, Mehdi. (2019). Intent of traders in smart contracts: terms of credit and how to obtain it. Two scientific journals of Islamic Law Research. Volume 49. Pp:271-300. (In Persian)
  • Raskin, Max. (2017). "THE LAW AND LEGALITY OF SMART CONTRACTS" . GEORGETOWN LAW TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 305-340.
  • Rühl , Giesela. (2020) . "Smart (legal) contracts, or Which (contract) law for smart contracts?" . Benedetta Cappiello & Gherardo Carullo (eds.), Blockchain, Law and Governance, Springer, 1-22.
  • Safaei, Seyed Hossein. (2009). General rules of contracts. Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian)
  • Safaei, Seyed Hossein, Kazemi, Mahmoud & et. (2013). International Sale Law. Tehran: University of Tehran. (In Persian)
  • Savelyev, (2017). "Contract Law 2.0: ‘Smart’ contracts as the beginning of the end of classic contract law". Journal of Information & Communication Technology Law, 26, 116-134.
  • Schulpen, Ruben. (2018). "Smart contracts in the Netherlands" . International Business Law, 1-88.
  • Shahidi, Mehdi. (2021). Effects of Contracts and Obligations. Tehran: Majd. (In Persian)
  • Shahidi, Mehdi. (2020). Terms of the contract. Tehran: Majd. (In Persian)
  • Sharifi, Seyed Hamaluddin, Burmi, Golnaz. (2018). The legal nature of smart representatives in the field of electronic contracts. Journal of Legal Research. Volume 33. Pp:27-54. (In Persian)
  • Shiravi, Abdul Hussein. (2010). international Business law. Tehran: Samt. (In Persian)
  • Soare, Alfred. (2019). "Smart Contracts in View of the Civil Code" , symposium on applied computing, 392-399.
  • Taghizadeh, Ebrahim, Ahmadi, Afshin(2015). The position of unfair terms in Iranian law with a look at Article 46 of the Electronic Commerce Law. Quarterly Journal of Private Law Research. Volume 3 number 10. Pp:10-42. (In Persian)
  • Werbach , Kevin, Cornell, Nicolas. (2017). "Contracts Ex Machinea" , Duke Law Journal, 67(2), 313-382.
  • Woebbeking, Maren K. (2019). "The Impact of Smart Contracts on
    Traditional Concepts of Contract Law",  JIPITEC, 10(1), 106-119.

    • فایل ها

    سابقه مقاله

    • تاریخ دریافت: 18 اسفند 1400
    • تاریخ بازنگری: 28 خرداد 1401
    • تاریخ پذیرش: 08 مرداد 1401

    هم رسانی

    ارجاع به این مقاله

    آمار