امکان سنجی اعمال اصل احتیاط در حقوق مسؤولیت مدنی ایران با تأکید بر نظام حقوقی فرانسه

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

در عصر حاضر، بشر متوجه شده است که ضرورت جلوگیری از خطر، نباید صرفا محدود به خطرات قطعی باشد که رابطه‌ی سببیت میان آن‌ها و وقوع زیان از نظر علمی ثابت شده بلکه لازم است در مواردی نیز که رابطه‌ی سببیت میان خطر و وقوع زیان سنگین باعدم قطعیت علمی مواجه است و این عدم قطعیت، از درجه احتمال گذر کرده و به مرحله ظن رسیده باشد، از اصل احتیاط و اقدامات احتیاطی بهره برد. حال آیا با توجه به ساختار نظام مسئولیت مدنی، می توان این اصل را به عنوان یک تکلیف در نظام های حقوقی در نظر گرفت؟ در رویه قضایی برخی کشورهای اروپایی همچون فرانسه این اصل به عنوان یک تکلیف قانونی شناخته شده و دارای کارکرد بازدارندگی است. این مقاله با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی و با استفاده از منابع کتابخانه ای، امکان پذیری اعمال اصل احتیاط در حقوق ایران را بررسی می کند. نتایج نشان می دهد که با توجه به قانون الحاق دولت جمهوری اسلامی ایران به کنوانسیون تنوع زیستی مصوب 1375 و قانون کنوانسیون چارچوب حفاظت از محیط زیست دریایی دریای خزر مصوب 1384 که در آن از اصل احتیاط سخن گفته شده، زمینه برای اعمال این اصل در حقوق ایران وجود دارد و مسئولیت مدنی صرفا مختص جبران خسارت از ضرر نبوده بلکه جلوگیری از وقوع خطرِ مظنون منجر به خسارت را که از نظر عقلی و اقتصادی مقابله با آن قابل توجیه باشد، در بر می‌گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Feasibility of applying the precautionary principle in Iran's civil liability law with emphasis on the French legal system

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Asadi 1
  • Hasan Badini 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

In the present era, humanity has realized that the necessity of preventing danger should not be limited only to definite dangers where the causal relationship between them and the occurrence of harm has been scientifically proven. Rather, it is necessary to utilize the precautionary principle and precautionary measures in cases where the causal relationship between the danger and the occurrence of severe harm faces scientific uncertainty, and this uncertainty has passed the degree of probability and reached the stage of suspicion. Now, considering the structure of the civil liability system, can this principle be considered a duty in legal systems? In the judicial practice of some European countries such as France, this principle has been recognized as a legal duty and has a deterrent function. This article examines the feasibility of applying the precautionary principle in Iranian law using a descriptive-analytical method and library resources. The results show that given the Law on the Accession of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Convention on Biological Diversity approved in 1996 and the Law on the Framework Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Caspian Sea approved in 2005, which mentions the precautionary principle, there is a basis for applying this principle in Iranian law, and civil liability is not limited to compensation for harm, but also includes preventing the occurrence of a suspected risk leading to damage that can be rationally and economically justified in dealing with.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Definite Dangers
  • Elements of Civil Liability
  • Precautionary Principle
  • Prevention Principle
  • Suspected Dangers
  • .Aghainia, H (2013), Sports Law, 13th Edition, Tehran: Mizan )In Persian.(

 

  • Ambrus, M. (2012). "The precautionary principle and a fair allocation of the burden of proof in international environmental law", Review of Europran Community & International Environmental Law, 21, No. 4, pp:259-270 (In English).
  • Amid Zanjani, A.A (2003), Grounds for Guarantee: An Introduction to Civil Liability and its Causes and Effects in Islamic Jurisprudence, First Edition, Tehran: Mizan )In Persian.(
  • Asadi, Z. Khorsandian, M.A. (2022), "A Comparative Study of the Principle of Precaution in Modern Law and Iranian and Islamic Law", Number 2, pp:1-36 )In Persian.(
  • Badini, H (2004), "The Purpose of Civil Liability," Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, Number 66, pp. 55-113 )In Persian(.
  • Boggio, A., (2005), "The compensation of the victims of the Creutzfeldt Jacob Disease in the United Kingdom", Medical Law International, Volume: 7, issue 2, pp: 149-167 (In English).
  • Badini, H, Khodkar, R, Rahmati, P (2016), "The Economic Scope of the Rule of Negligence and its Efficiency in Iranian Law," Journal of Private Law Studies, Volume 46, Number 1, pp. 21-39 )In Persian(.
  • Badini, H, Shabani Kandsari, H (2018). "A Comparative Study of the Basis of Civil Liability of Service Providers in Imami Jurisprudence, Iranian Law and French Law," Nameh Mofid, Number 110, pp: 3-22 )In Persian.(
  • Badini, H, Shabani Kandsari, H, Radpour, S (2012). "Strict Liability: Foundations and Cases." Journal of Comparative Law Studies, Number 3, pp. 19-36 )In Persian.(
  • Calliess, Christian, Stockhaus ,Heidi, (2012). "Precautionary Principle and Nanomaterials:Reach Revisited", Journal European environmental & planning law(JEEPL),Vol. 9,Iss 2, 113-135 (In English).
  • Caranta, Roberto (2007). "the Precautionary Principle in Italian Law", in Le principe de précaution en droit administrative, precautionary principle and Administrative Law XVLLth Congress 16-22 July 2006, Paqus, Michel, Bruxelles: Bruylant (In English).
  • Chanteur, Janine (2001). "A philosopher's view", in La prévention et la protection dans la société du risqué: le principe de precaution prevention and protection in the risk society: the precautionary principle, Perret, L, Ridant , A, Guardiola, B, Elsevier: Amesterdam. (In French)
  • Chen, Ling (2016). "Realizing the precautionary principle indue diligence", Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 25, pp:1-23(In English).
  • Comtois, Suzanne, (2007), "On the idea of precation in Canadian administrative law", in Le principe de précaution en droit administrative, precautionary principle and Administrative Law XVLLth Congress 16-22 July 2006, Paqus, Michel, Bruxelles: Bruylant. (In French)
  • Columbia University, Sciences-Po, Ecole polytechnique & Université Paris 1 in partnership with IDDRI, (2003). "Revisiting global public policies for sustainable development - a transatlantic dialogue", Paris (In English).
  • Coulon, Jean-Marie (2001). "The precautionary principle in law: introduction", in La prévention et la protection dans la société du risqué: le principe de précaution prevention and protection in the risk society: the precautionary principle, Perret, L, Ridant, A, Guardiola, B, Elsevier: Amesterdam (In French).
  • Dascălu, Diana-Nicoleta, Urs, Iosif R. (2012). "Aspects of civil liability, as a form of social liabilty,in the context of eco-economy", Challenges of the knowledge society. Legal sciences, Vol 2, pp:487- 498 (In English).
  • Degergue, Maryse (2007). "les avancees du principe de précaution en droit administratif Francais", in Le principe de précaution en droit administrative, precautionary principle and Administrative Law XVLLth Congress 16-22 July 2006, Paqus, Michel, Bruxelles: Bruylant (In French).
  • Dewees, Donald N. (1992). "The role of tort law in controlling environmental pollution", Canadian Public Policy, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 425-442 (In English).
  • Fourcher, K. (2002). Principe de précaution et risqué sanitaire, Harmattan: France (In French).
  • Gadbin, Daniel (2012). "Cheptel sous haute tension : du bon usage du principe de precaution", Droit rural n° 406, repère 8, Dalloz (In French).
  • Garcia, Fanny (2008). "Le défaut Indécelable de la chose en droit de la responsabilité civile", Thése de doctorat en Droit privé, Université de Nantes (In French).
  • Godard, Olivier (2003). "Revisiting the precautionary principle under the light of 2002-2003 French and international events", Hal archives-ouvertes: Paris, pp:1-16 (In English).
  • Hanschel, Dirk (2007). "progress and the precautionary principle in administrative law country report on Germany", in Le principe de précaution en droit administrative, precautionary principle and Administrative Law XVLLth Congress 16-22 July 2006, Paqus, Michel, Bruxelles: Bruylant (In French).
  • Hayati, A.A (2014), "The Concept of the Precautionary Principle and its Place in Civil Liability," Islamic Law Research Journal, Fifteenth Year, Second Issue, pp. 185-206. )In Persian(
  • Holdway, Aaron (2008). "Reducing uncertainty the need to clarify the key elements of the precautionary principle", Consilience, No. 1, pp: 37-51 (In English).
  • Izanloo, M. Asadi, Z (2020), "A Comparative Study of the Dual Functions of the Precautionary Principle in Civil Liability", Comparative Law Studies, Number 2, pp: 407-428. )In Persian(
  • Jiang, P (2014). "A uniform precautionary principle under EU law", PKU transnational law review, Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 490-518 (In English).
  • Jourdan, P, Translated by Majid Adib (2015), Principles of Civil Liability, Fourth Edition, Tehran: Mizan. )In Persian(
  • Juanjuan, Sun (2013). "The international harmonization of food safety regulation in the light of the American, European and Chinese law", Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Nantes (Institut de Recherche en Droit Privé) (In English).
  • Kadkhodaei, A.A, Salari, A (2017), "Precaution: A Customary Principle in the European Union?", Public Law Studies, Forty-Seventh Period, Number 3, pp. 561-583. )In Persian(
  • Katouzian, N (2012), Civil Law: General Theory of Obligations, 6th Edition, Tehran: Mizan. )In Persian(
  • Katouzian, N (2019), Preliminary Course of Civil Law: Legal Events, Twenty-Second Edition, Ganj Danesh: Tehran )In Persian(.
  • Lofstedt, Ragnar (2014). "The precautionary principle in the EU: Why a formal review is long overdue", Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp:137-163 (In English).
  • Puttagunta, P. Saradhi, (2001). "The precautionary principle in the regulation of genetically modified (In English).
  • Stevens, Mary (2002). "The precautionary principle in the international arena", Sustainable development law & policy, Vol 2, Iss 2, pp:13-15 (In English).
  • Tourneau, Philippe (2016). "Responsabilité (en général)", Dalloz, pp. 1-87 (In French).
  • United Nations educational,scientific and cultural organization, (2005), "precautionary Principle World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology", workshops of UNESCO:France (In English).
  • Van Lang, Agathe (2016). Droit de l'environnement, 4 ed, mise à jour Puf: France (In French).
  • Xiao, ZHU (2015). "Conflict and balance between environmental protection and trade liberalization general and particular applying elements of the precautionary principle in international trade", Frontiers of law in China, Vol 10, No 2, pp:245-267(In English).
  • Yazdanian, A (2000), Civil Law: The Scope of Civil Liability. First Edition, Tehran: Adabestan. )In Persian(
  • Zargoosh, M (2013), Civil Liability of the Government and its Employees, First Edition, Tehran: Jungle. )In Persian(.