نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Suspension in contracts constitutes one of the foundational and influential concepts in Imamiyyah jurisprudence and Iranian civil law. This notion becomes particularly complex and analytically challenging in cases where a subsequent contract is made contingent upon the non-realization of a prior one. While jurisprudential and legal literature has predominantly focused on the general conditions for the validity of suspensive clauses, the specific inquiry into the permissibility of stipulating the non-realization of a prior contract as a condition precedent has received limited independent and systematic attention.The core objective of this research is to examine, from both jurisprudential and legal perspectives, the feasibility of utilizing such a condition as the basis for suspending a subsequent contract and to assess the legal validity of this mechanism. Accordingly, the present study adopts a descriptive-analytical methodology and draws upon the opinions of Imamiyyah jurists and legal scholars. It explores the necessary characteristics of a valid condition precedent in Imamiyyah jurisprudence and Iranian statutory law, and analyzes various scenarios of non-realization of the prior contract—including rescission, termination, mutual cancellation, nullity, annulment, and the non-fulfillment of a suspensive condition—with a view to their suitability as valid suspensive bases for subsequent contracts. The findings suggest that while certain scenarios may permit the validity of such suspension, this permissibility is conditional upon the fulfillment of specific criteria, particularly the independence of the condition from the unilateral will of the obligor.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)