زمینه‌های حقی و حکمی عمل حقوقی رجوع در پرتو فقه، قانون و دکترین حقوقی

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.

2 استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکد حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

3 استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکد حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.

چکیده

استقراء در منابع حقوقی، حکایت از کثرت موارد استعمال «رجوع» در بحث از اعمال حقوقی دارد. آثار مدون در مقام تشریح این لفظ و احکام مترتب بر آن، گرچه معتنابه می‌باشند، لکن، با وجود تفاوت در ماهیت عمل «رجوع» در هر یک از مواضع و بتبع، اوصاف و احکام، ماهیت آن به نحو اطلاق، «حق» یا «حکم» توصیف شده است. این وضع، ناشی از تعابیر مختلفی است که در آثار حقوقی و فقهی از دو مفهوم «حق» و «حکم» و رابطه منطقی آنها بعمل آمده است. لذا مسأله «رجوع» در مواردی متعدد؛ همچون شرط مباشرت متعاقد یا موقِع، همچنین، قابلیت اسقاط، محل تأمل می‌باشد. نتیجه حاصل از این پژوهش که به روش توصیفی تحلیلی انجام یافته، حاکی از موقعیت «رجوع» به عنوان مشترک لفظی در مواضع مختلف در مقام «حق» یا «حکم» بوده، به عکس قسم حقی، در نوع حکمی، قائم به شخص و غیر قابل اسقاط است و این نسبیت، با اتکا به معیار نظم مقتضی زندگی جمعی، حمایت می‌شود. دکترین حقوقی، قایل بر قابلیت تقسیم حقوق به اعتبار قابلیت اسقاط و انتقال‌ پذیری به اقسام «حق مثبت»، «حق منفی»، «حق ادعا» و «حق قدرت» بوده، در این میان، حقوق بنیادین مربوط به نوع بشر را در ردیف «حق منفی»، غیر قابل اسقاط و انتقال می‌داند. در قانون مدنی فرانسه، واژگان “Retractation” و “Revocation” به مفهوم «رجوع» استعمال شده، چنانچه موضوع آن امری مربوط به نظم عمومی و اخلاق حسنه باشد، «جواز عمل حقوقی» از قواعد آمره و مخصص اصل حاکمیت اراده محسوب و در نتیجه، اسقاط رجوع غیر معتبر خواهد بود. در غیر این‌صورت، «جواز» حقی محدود به روابط خصوصی و قابل اسقاط تلقی خواهد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The legal and Normative Foundations of Revocation as a Juristic Act in Islamic Jurisprudence, Iranian Law, and Legal Doctrine

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Ebadi 1
  • Sam Mohammadi 2
  • Hamid Abhari 3
1 PhD student in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
چکیده [English]

An inductive survey of legal sources reveals the frequent use of the term in discussions of juristic acts. Although considerable doctrinal work addresses this concept and its associated legal effects, the nature of revocation—despite its varying manifestations and the resulting diversity of attributes and legal consequences—has often been described in absolute terms, either as a right or as a normative rule. This ambiguity arises from divergent interpretations in legal and jurisprudential literature concerning the concepts of rights and rules and the logical relationship between them. Consequently, the legal characterization of revocation in various contexts—such as the requirement for personal performance by the contracting party or declarant, and the possibility of waiver—remains open to critical examination. The findings of the present research, conducted through a descriptive–analytical method, demonstrate that revocation functions as a homonymous term whose legal nature varies across different contexts, assuming either a rights-based or a normative character. Unlike its rights-based form, revocation in its normative form is inherently personal and non-waivable. This relativity is justified by reference to the criterion of public order, which is essential for collective social life. Legal doctrine classifies rights based on their waivability and transferability into categories such claim-rights, liberty-rights, power- rights, and immunity-rights. immunity-rights. Within this framework, fundamental human rights are categorized as negative rights, considered non-transferable and non-waivable. In French civil law, the terms *rétractation* and *révocation* denote revocation. When the subject matter concerns public order or morality (*ordre public* and *bonnes mœurs*), the permissibility of the juristic act is governed by mandatory rules that limit the principle of party autonomy, rendering any waiver of the right of revocation invalid. Otherwise, permissibility is regarded as a private-law entitlement, confined to private relationships and capable of waiver.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Contract
  • Unilateral Obligation
  • Revocation (Retractation)
  • Transfer and conveying
  • Waiver
  1. Almasi, Nejad Ali, (1999), Conflict of national laws about the marriage. (In Persian)

    Ara.jri.ac. ir. (In Persian)

    Asadi Nezhad., M & Vahedi Zadeh, J. (2024). Unilateral promise in the scope of Iranian Jurisprudence and law and the principles of European contract law, Journal of Comparative law research paper, period 8, No 2.) doi:

                10.22080/lps.2022.24573.1435(In Persian)

    Bahr Al- oloum, M, (1983). Balaghat Al- faghih, First volume, Tehran: Manshourat Maktabat Al- sadegh(P), PP: 16, 17, 19 & 21. (In Arabic)

    Boyer.Louis. (1993) contrats et conventions, Rep, civ. Paris. Dalloz. (In French)

    1. Dictionnaire juridique de serge braudo, (In French)

    Ebne Manzoor, (1944). Lesan Al- arab, 12 volume, Publication of Dar Sadere Beiroot. (In Arabic)

    Ebne Rajab, Abd –Alrahman. (1419), Ghavaed, Dare Ebne Afan, Saudi Arabia. (In Arabic)

    Emami, H. (2009). Civil Law, Fifth volume:13 th edition, Tehran, Eslamieh publication, p: 88. (In Persian)

    Emami, H, (2019), Civil Law, The 6- volume course of the book, Esfahan, Center of Ghaemieh computer research, tebyan library net، P: 172, (Access in 01, 07, 2021). (In Arabic)

    Esfahani, R. (2013). Simple substances in words of Qur`an, publication of Mortezavieh school to revive, Tehran, effects of Jafary. (In Persian)

    Esfahani, M.H, (1942). Thesis in research about Al-hagh and Al-hokm, Qom, Anvar Al- Mahdi, P: 21. (In Arabic)

    Eshia.ir/feghh/arshive/text/shabzendehdar/osool/99 (In Persian)

    Fasihi Zadeh, A, (2008), Permission And It`s Effects, Qom, Tebyan Cultural and Information Association, Tebyan library Net (Access in 10, 07, 2019) (In Persian)

    Fazeli Mehrabadi, A. (2010). Jurisprudential and legal Probing in about revocation and referral in legal acts, thesis of M.A, Tehran, Allameh tabatabaei university. (In Persian)

    Frooghi, A. (2012). The effects and characteristics of Right in Shia jurisprudence and civil law, no 1. Pp: 1- 14, (In Persian)

    Georges, Hubrecht & Georges, Vermell (1987), Droit civil, fourth edition. (In French)

    J.Masson and S.M.C Rentney (1997), principle of family law, Sweden, Sweet and maxwell, sixth edition. (In French)

    Jafary langroudy, M. (1999), Mabsoot in legal terminology, third volume, Tehran, library of gang e danesh, p: 1669. (In Persian)

    Jafary langroudy, M. (2007), Public dictionary of law, Alfaregh, third volume, second edition, Tehran, Publication of Ganj e danesh, Pp: 32- 33. (In Persian)

    Javadi Amoli, A., (2010), Tasnim, volume 17, Qom, publication: Esra. (In Persian)

    Jacqueline, Carbonnier & Rubellin Devichi. (1985). (In French)

    Pitter, J., (2013). The Philosophy of rights translated by Moshtagh Zargoosh & Mojtaba Hemmati, first volume, Tehran, Mizan publication, p: 42. (In Persian)

    Hasan zadeh, S. (2023), Legal probing the testament in Iran and French law by focus in rate of government`s interference, The first of international conference in international law, law, politic science and human science, code of article: llphconf 01_051. (In Persian)

    Heidari. H, Hajati, M. (2011), The alimony of woman in Iran, French and Sweden law, The journal of phsychology and cultural of woman, No 7. (In Persian)

    Hoseni‌ Shahroodi, A, (1988). Mohazerat tei Feghh Al- gafari, Almakasebat Almoharrameh: (quoted) from the Taghrirat Abhas Abei Al- Ghasem Mousavi Khoei, Qom, Beiroot, Dar Al- ketab Al-Eslami, 2 voloume, Pp: 20- 21 & 30. (In Arabic)

    Kenner, M. (1965), Le droit simple et complet, cinquieme edition. Paris, Publisher: Librairie generale de droit et de jurisprudence, edition 4. (In French)

    Khosravi, H., Haji azizi, B. & Niazi, GH. (2016), The nature of revocation and it`s difference from similar meanings, journal of studies of jurisprudence and Islamic legal, no 15, Pp: 147- 174. (In Persian)

    Katozian, N. (1992), Civil law, Family, 2 volumes, first volume, third edition, Tehran, sahami Enteshar publication, (In Persian)

    Katozian, N. (1995), introduction of law and study in legal system of Iran, nineteenth volume, Tehran, sahami Enteshar publication, (In Persian)

    Katozian, N. (1998), Philosophy of law: definition and nature of right, first volumeTehran, sahami Enteshar publication, (In Persian) (In Persian)

    Katozian, N, (2002), primary pried of properties and ownership, Tehran, Mizan publication, p: 209. (In Persian)

    Katozian, N, Legal acts (contracts and unilateral act), fifth edition, Tehran, sahami Enteshar publication, (In Persian)

    Karimi, A., Shabani kandsari, H., & Eskandari, H, (2016). Deliberation in separation in ownership, right and commandment in jurisprudence, Tehran, journal of studies to jurisprudence and Islamic law, year 8, no 15, Pp: 247- 274. (In Persian)

    Keshavarzi, M, (2017). Similarities and differences between civil code of Iran and Farance, First edition, Tehran, Majd publication, Pp: 104, 106, 111, 117, 146, 122, 151, 154, 157, 167 & 172. (In Persian)

    Khomeini, R, (1987). Book of sale, first volume, Qom: Esmaeilian, Pp: 21- 26. (In Persian)

    Khoei, A, (1933). Ajvad Al- Taghrirat, 2 volume, Qom, Mostafavi publication, p: 383. (In Arabic)

    Mohaghghegh Damad, M, (2010), Principles of jurisprudence (civil part), 27th edition, Center of eslamic science publication. (In Persian)

    Mesbah. M, (1998). rights and politic in Qur`an, wrote by Mohammad Mehrabi, Qom: Educational and research Association Emam Khomeini. PP: 25- 27. (In Persian)

    Mostafavi, K, (2009), nature of commandment, journal of studies of private law, year 39, no 1, PP: 289- 310. (In Persian)

    Mohammad abou Al- Sooud, R & Zahran, H.M.M, (1998). Bases of Law, Eskandarieh, Dar o Al- matbooat Al- Jameeiah, p: 182. (In Arabic)

    Marouf Al- Hosseni, H, (1919). Nazariat Al-Aghd fei Feghh Al-Jafary, Beiroot, Manshourat Maktabat Al- Hashem, Pp: 34- 37. (In Arabic)

    Makarem Shirazi, N, (1998). Anvar Al- feghaheh, 6 volume, Qom, School of Emam Ali (P), P: 143. (In Arabic)

    Mayer, P. (1998) Droit international prive, 6 ed, Montchrestien, (In French)

    Milani, M.H, Mohazerat fei Feghh Al- Emamieh, Book of sale, Ferdoosi University, Pp: 3 & 25. (In Arabic)

    Mirzaye Ghomi, Ab- Alghasem, (1992). Jame Al- shetat fei ojvabehe Al- Soalat, Corrector: Morteza Razavi, 4 volume, fourth edition, Qom, publishing by Jame Al-shetat cultural and information institute., Pp: 151 & 169. (In Arabic)

    Majlis،ic،ir. (In Persian)

    Naeini, M.H, (1993). Manyat- Altaleb, Maktab Al- Mohammadieh, Tehran, First edition, 3, p: 286. (In Arabic)

    Najafi Khansary, M. (1998). Javaher- Al kalam, Dar Al- Toras –Alarabi, Beiroot, 7 edition. (In Arabic)

    Najafi Khansary, M, (2000). Manyat Al- Taleb fei Sharh Al- Makaseb, 2 volume, P: 106. (In Arabic)

    Mirshekari, M., & Azad Bakht, sh. (2021). Legal Analysis Of different forms of giving dowry with emphasis on the means of interpreting the will of the parties, Tehran, Journal of two scientific quarterly journals of jurisprudence and family law, 26, number 75, Pp 5 – 27. (In Persian)

    Pakbaz, S. (2023), comment on the French`s civil law, First edition,Tehran, Mizan Publication, Pp: 101, 103 & 119. (In Persian)

    Paul- ludovic Niel, Marcie Morin (2017). la retractation de la revocation testamentaire, (In French)

    Pilvar, R. (2013), Philosophy of property right, second volume, Tehran, sahami Enteshar publication, p: 92. (In Persian)

    Sadr, M.B. (1978). Al-halghat Al- sanieh, Beiroot, Dar Al-ketab Al-Lobnani, Pp: 15- 16. (In Arabic)

    Tabatabaei Hakim, M, (2017). Nahj Al-feghaheh, Theory of contract, Qom, Dar Al- helal, Pp: 12 & 18. (In Arabic)

    Taghizadeh, a., & Yavari, S. (2020). Comparative study in Revocation of Donation at Iran law and Civil law of European Union (DSFR), Journal of probing the private law, Year 8, No 31, Pp: 9 – 35. (In Persian)

    Tabatabaei Yazdi, M.K, (1993). Takmelat Al- Orvato Al- vosgha, 2 volume, Qom, Davari publication, Pp: 173- 174. (In Arabic)

    Tohidi, M.A, (1991). Mesbah Al-feghaheh fei Al- Moamelat, part 2, (quoted) from the Taghrirat Abei Al- Ghasem Mousavi Khoei, Qom, Beiroot, Dar Al- ketab Al-Eslami, second edition, Pp: 20, 21 & 30. (In Arabic)

    Toosi, m., (1986). Tahzib Al- ahkam, correction by M.KH, H,: Tehran, Dar o Al- kotobe Al- Eslamieh. (In Arabic)