نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Iran’s civil procedure law contains significant gaps regarding procedural sanctions. The absence of a dedicated and independent section on procedural sanctions, along with the lack of sanctions for certain important procedural rules, underscores the need to examine the foundations of such sanctions through a comparative analysis of Iranian and French law. This study employs a descriptive–analytical method to explore the subject matter. From the author’s perspective, identifying the origins of each procedural sanction enables a clearer understanding of its underlying foundations. A comparative analysis of Iranian and French law reveals that the causes and origins of procedural sanctions can be summarized as follows: the existence of substantive or formal defects; the occurrence of damage; conflict with public order; violation of essential formalities; breach of fundamental elements of procedural acts; infringement of procedural principles; incapacity or inefficiency of the judicial system; and failure to achieve the purpose of the procedural act. These factors can thus be regarded as the foundational basis for determining procedural sanctions. Accordingly, the legislator, when establishing procedural sanctions, may determine proportionate penalties by examining and evaluating these foundations. Similarly, the judge, as the executor of the law, gains a deeper understanding of the causes and foundations of the sanctions applied in judicial decisions, thereby promoting greater coherence and consistency between the enforcement of the law and judicial interpretation.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)