نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، ایران
2 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
From the very beginning of the establishment, the governor has been a symbol of the state and the integration of the offices and the guarantor of the unity of the state and nation in the province. Over the past decade, some of Iran's high governors and officials have repeatedly claimed that the authority of the governors is not enough to carry out their duties. The main question of this research is that from which perspective, is the increase of the powers of governors in Iran a logical and significant necessity regarding comparative comparison? What is the nature of tools and authorities that need to be modified or created? If there is an increase in authority, is there any need to modify or even reduce the scope of other aspects of the role of governors in Iran?
The research findings suggested that the authority of governors in Iran do not have almost any of the management tools that French governors enjoy. Therefore, the claims made by the governors and government in Iran that the authority is inadequate and imbalanced is not only correct but also requires profound and extensive reforms to bring about a transformation, especially bringing the government closer to the local people .Another finding of this research is that the position of governorship is complex and indistinct. and the solution is the adaptability and permanent innovations and not an increase in only legal authorities. The procedures, continuity, and stability in the central government's practice of strengthening the authorities of decongestion institutions, especially the governor, can have more objective realizations of changes and developments in legal instruments.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)