تأثیر روش‌شناسی مطالعات تطبیقی در آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، پردیس البرز، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

یکی از مشکلات فراروی پژوهشگران مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، فقدان اجماع برای انتخاب یک روش خاص جهت انجام این مطالعات است. از یک سو، «حقوق تطبیقی» و به‌ویژه «روش‌شناسی آن» علمی جوان و نوپا بوده و در دهه‌های اخیر همواره مورد نقد و تغییرات گسترده قرار گرفته است. از سوی دیگر، تفکیک مطالعه تطبیقی از بررسی بستر تاریخی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی کشورهای مورد مطالعه ممکن نیست. این امر، انتخاب روشی مناسب برای مطالعه تطبیقی را به جهت جنبۀ چندوجهی بودن آن، با دشواری مضاعف مواجه نموده است. در این پژوهش پس از تبیین مفاهیم بنیادین مربوط به روش‌شناسی حقوق تطبیقی، بستر تاریخی و روند شکل‌گیری آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران بررسی شده است. با توجه به نوپابودن موضوع «روش‌شناسی حقوق تطبیقی» به‌طور ویژه و به‌طور کلی نو پدید بودن «حقوق تطبیقی» به‌عنوان رشته‌ای مستقل از سایر رشته‌های مطالعات حقوقی، نظام آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران علی‌رغم تلاش‌های قابل‌ستایش اندیشمندان، نتوانسته است بهره کافی را از مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، به‌ویژه در حوزۀ نظام قانون‌گذاری آیین دادرسی مدنی برده باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Comparative Study Methodologies on Civil Procedure in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Majid Ghamami 1
  • Hassan Mohseni 2
  • Nima Rahmani Fard 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Private and Islamic Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Private and Islamic Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 PhD student of private law, Alborz campus of Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

One of the challenges encountered by researchers in comparative law studies is the lack of consensus regarding the selection of a specific methodology for conducting these studies. On one hand, “comparative law” and especially “its methodology” is a relatively young and evolving field that has faced numerous criticisms and evolutions in recent decades. On the other hand, it is essential to separate a comparative study from the historical, social, and cultural context of the countries under study, as these factors cannot be separated from a comparative analysis. This complexity has made it difficult to identify an appropriate method for conducting comparative studies due to their multifaceted nature. In this study, we first explain the fundamental concepts related to the methodology of comparative law, the historical context and the development of Iranian civil procedure. Given the nascent nature of the subject of “comparative law methodology” in particular and the recent emergence of “comparative law” as an independent field of legal studies more broadly, the Iranian civil procedure system, despite the commendable efforts of scholars, has not sufficiently from comparative law studies, particularly in the area of the legislative framework of civil procedure law.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Comparative law
  • Methodology
  • Methods
  • Comparative studied
  • civil procedural law

مراجع

Afshar, Hasan, (2010), Introduction to Comparative Law, Tehran: Tehran University Publishing. [In Persian]
Al-Dabbagh, H. (2013). Le Droit Compere Comme Instrument de Modernisation: L'exemple des Codifications Civiles des États Arabes du Moyen –Orient. Revue de Droit: Université de Sherbrooke, 43. [In French]
 
Amin, Seyed Hassan, (2003), Iran's Judicial System from the Beginning of Qajar to the Constitutional Revolution, Public Law Research Quarterly, Journal of Allameh Tabatabai University, Vol. 5, No. 9. [In Persian]
Ash-Shahid al-Awwal, (1989), Al-Lum'ah Ad-Dimashqiyah. Translated and explained by Ali Shirvani and Mohsen Ghoruyan (2012), Tehran: Dar Al-Fikr Publishing. [In Persian]
 
Castro Mendes, Aluisio Gonçalves, (2020), Comparative Procedural Law in the Contemporary World, Athens Journal of Law, Vol. 6, Issue 2. [In English]
Capletti, Morrow and Brian Chi Garth, (2018), Civil Procedure Code, first volume, first edition, translated by Hassan Mohseni, publishing Enteshar co. [In English]
David, Rene, Kami Giofre Spinozzi and Marie Gore, (2020)  An Introduction to Comparative Law and two Major Contemporary Legal Systems, Translated by seyed hossin safaey and peyman dadres, Mizan Publishing. [In Persian]
Dodson, Scott, (2008), The Challenge of Comparative Civil Procedure, Faculty Publications. 165. [In English]
Ghamami, Majid and Ismail Shaygan, (2022), Introduction to "General Theory of Procedure" (a comparative study on the methodology of preparation of general theory), Comparative Law Research, 26 (3). [In Persian]
Ghamami, Majid; (2009), coordination of Civil Procedure(published in the book of articles donated ti dr naser katouzian), Tehran: Tehran university Publishing. [In Persian]
Ghamami, Majid; Mohseni, Hassan, (2007), Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure, Tehran: Mizan Publishing. [In Persian]
Gottwald, Peter, (2005), Comparative Civil Procedure, Risumeikan Law Review, No. 22. [In English]
Groups of Writers, (2008), Reflections on Comparative Law, First edition, Samt publishing. [In Persian]
Hassanzadeh, Mehdi, (2014), the Effect of the Connection of Claims in Civil Proceedings, Legal Studies, vol. 7, No. 1. [In Persian]
Herissinejad, Kamaladdin, (2009),  Study of the Factors of Roman-German Legal System’s Impact on Iranian Modern Law, Law Quarterly, Tehran University Faculty of Law and Political Science Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2. [In Persian]
Herzog, Peter E. and Delmar Karlen, (2022), Civil Procedure Law, Translated by Hassan Mohseni and Mehsa Aghaei Vol. 1, First Edition, Publishing Enteshar Co. [In Persian]
Hormozi, Khairullah, (2017), summing up and distinguishing between lawsuits and comparing it with dividing one lawsuit into several lawsuits in Iranian and French law, private law research, 6th year, No. 23. [In Persian]
Hormozi, Khairullah and Seyed Fariduddin Takapo, (2019), Rational requirements of demand, Private Law Research, Year 8, No. 32. [In English]
Jaluzot, B. (2005). Méthodologie du Droit Comparé: Bilan et Prospective. Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, 57(1), 29-48. [In French]
Lugrand, Pir, (2012), Comparative Law, second edition, translated by Alireza Mohammadzadeh Vadghani, Mizan Legal Foundation.  [In Persian]
Mohseni, Hasan, (2014), Administration of Civil Proceedings Based on Cooperation and within the Framework of Procedural Principles, Tehran: Enteshar co. [In Persian]
Mohseni, Hasan, (2016), French Civil Procedure Code, Vol. 1 Vol. 2, Tehran: Entesharco. [In Persian]
Mohseni, Elaheh, (2019), Methodology of Comparative Law, Comparative Law, Vol. 10, Issue 2. [In Persian]
Scarciglia, R. (2015). A Brief History of Legal Comparison: A Lesson from the Ancient to Post-Modern Times. Beijing L. Rev., 6, 296. [In English]
 
Shahbazinia, Morteza, (2005), The Status of Comparative Law and the Necessity for Revising Its Teaching, Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, No. 34. [In Persian]
Shiravi, Abd- Alhossin, Comparative Law, Second Edition, Samt publishing, 2023. [In Persian]
Smits, Jan M., (2006), Comparative Law and its Influence on National Legal Systems, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford University Press. [In English]
Vahedi, Qadratullah, (2008), The Requirements of Civil Procedure, Tehran: Mizan Publishing. [In Persian]
Wigmore, J. H. (1917). Nova Methodus Discendae Docendaeque Jurisprudentiae. Harvard Law Review, 30(8), 812-829. [In English]

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 02 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 20 دی 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 15 بهمن 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار