تأثیر روش‌شناسی مطالعات تطبیقی در آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، پردیس البرز، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

یکی از بزرگ‌ترین مشکلاتی که پژوهشگران حوزۀ مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی را هنگام انجام این مطالعات با خود مواجه می‌سازد این است که هیچ اجماعی برای انتخاب یک روش خاص برای انجام این مطالعات وجود ندارد. از طرفی «حقوق تطبیقی» و به‌ویژه مقولۀ «روش‌شناسی آن» علمی جوان و نوپا بوده و در دهه-های اخیر همواره موردنقد و تغییرات فراوان قرار گرفته است و از طرف دیگر عدم‌امکان انفکاک مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی از لزوم انجام مطالعات و بررسی بستر تاریخی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی کشورهای موردمطالعه، امکان اتخاذ روشی مناسب برای این مطالعات را به جهت جنبۀ چندوجهی و به عبارت ساده‌تر میان‌رشته‌ای‌بودن آن، با دشواری مضاعفی در وادی عمل و انجام پژوهش و نهایتاً امکان بهره‌برداری صحیح از این مطالعات مواجه نموده است؛ دشواری‌هایی که نظام حقوقی کشور ما و بالأخص حوزۀ «حقوق آیین دادرسی مدنی» از آن مستثنی نبوده و در این پژوهش تلاش گردیده است که پس از تبیین مفاهیم بنیادین مربوط به روش‌شناسی حقوق تطبیقی، با بررسی بستر تاریخی و روند شکل‌گیری نظام حقوق آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران به این مهم توجه گردد که با توجه به نوپابودن مقولۀ «روش‌شناسی حقوق تطبیقی» به‌طور ویژه و به‌طور کلی نو پدید بودن «حقوق تطبیقی» به‌عنوان رشته‌ای مستقل از سایر رشته‌های مطالعات حقوقی، نظام حقوق آیین دادرسی مدنی ایران علی‌رغم تلاش‌های وافر و قابل‌ستایش دکترین و علمای متأخر و متقدم، نتوانسته است بهره و عنایت کافی را از مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، به‌ویژه در حوزۀ نظام قانون‌گذاری در حقوق آیین دادرسی مدنی را داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The methodology of comparative sudies impact on civil procedure in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Majid Ghamami 1
  • Hassan Mohseni 2
  • Nima Rahmani Fard 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Private and Islamic Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Private and Islamic Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 PhD student of private law, Alborz campus of Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

One of the biggest problems that researchers in the field of comparative law studies face when conducting these studies is that there is no consensus to choose a specific method to conduct these studies. On the one hand, "comparative law" and especially the category of "its methodology" is a young and nascent science, and in recent decades it has always been criticized and changed a lot, and on the other hand, the feature of the impossibility of separation and inseparability of comparative law studies from Studies and investigation of the course and historical, social and cultural background of the countries under study, the possibility of adopting a suitable method for these studies due to its multifaceted aspect and in simpler words its interdisciplinary nature, with additional difficulty in conducting research and Finally, it has become possible to use these studies properly; The difficulties that the legal system of our country and especially the field of "civil procedural law" are not exempt from, and in this research, it has been tried to explain the fundamental concepts related to the methodology of comparative law, by examining the historical background and the process of formation of the legal system. The Civil Procedure Code of Iran should pay attention to the fact that due to the nascent nature of the category of "Comparative Law Methodology" in particular and the new emergence of "Comparative Law" as an independent field from other fields of legal studies, the legal system Iran's civil procedure, despite the abundant and commendable efforts of late and advanced doctrines and scholars, has not been able to benefit from comparative law studies, especially in the field of legislation in the field of civil procedure law.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Comparative law
  • Methodology
  • Methods
  • Comparative studied
  • civil procedural law
Afshar, Hasan, (2010), Introduction to Comparative Law, Tehran: Tehran University Publishing. [In Persian]
Al-Dabbagh, H. (2013). Le Droit Compere Comme Instrument de Modernisation: L'exemple des Codifications Civiles des États Arabes du Moyen –Orient. Revue de Droit: Université de Sherbrooke, 43. [In French]
 
Amin, Seyed Hassan, (2003), Iran's Judicial System from the Beginning of Qajar to the Constitutional Revolution, Public Law Research Quarterly, Journal of Allameh Tabatabai University, Vol. 5, No. 9. [In Persian]
Ash-Shahid al-Awwal, (1989), Al-Lum'ah Ad-Dimashqiyah. Translated and explained by Ali Shirvani and Mohsen Ghoruyan (2012), Tehran: Dar Al-Fikr Publishing. [In Persian]
 
Castro Mendes, Aluisio Gonçalves, (2020), Comparative Procedural Law in the Contemporary World, Athens Journal of Law, Vol. 6, Issue 2. [In English]
Capletti, Morrow and Brian Chi Garth, (2018), Civil Procedure Code, first volume, first edition, translated by Hassan Mohseni, publishing Enteshar co. [In English]
David, Rene, Kami Giofre Spinozzi and Marie Gore, (2020)  An Introduction to Comparative Law and two Major Contemporary Legal Systems, Translated by seyed hossin safaey and peyman dadres, Mizan Publishing. [In Persian]
Dodson, Scott, (2008), The Challenge of Comparative Civil Procedure, Faculty Publications. 165. [In English]
Ghamami, Majid and Ismail Shaygan, (2022), Introduction to "General Theory of Procedure" (a comparative study on the methodology of preparation of general theory), Comparative Law Research, 26 (3). [In Persian]
Ghamami, Majid; (2009), coordination of Civil Procedure(published in the book of articles donated ti dr naser katouzian), Tehran: Tehran university Publishing. [In Persian]
Ghamami, Majid; Mohseni, Hassan, (2007), Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure, Tehran: Mizan Publishing. [In Persian]
Gottwald, Peter, (2005), Comparative Civil Procedure, Risumeikan Law Review, No. 22. [In English]
Groups of Writers, (2008), Reflections on Comparative Law, First edition, Samt publishing. [In Persian]
Hassanzadeh, Mehdi, (2014), the Effect of the Connection of Claims in Civil Proceedings, Legal Studies, vol. 7, No. 1. [In Persian]
Herissinejad, Kamaladdin, (2009),  Study of the Factors of Roman-German Legal System’s Impact on Iranian Modern Law, Law Quarterly, Tehran University Faculty of Law and Political Science Journal, Vol. 39, No. 2. [In Persian]
Herzog, Peter E. and Delmar Karlen, (2022), Civil Procedure Law, Translated by Hassan Mohseni and Mehsa Aghaei Vol. 1, First Edition, Publishing Enteshar Co. [In Persian]
Hormozi, Khairullah, (2017), summing up and distinguishing between lawsuits and comparing it with dividing one lawsuit into several lawsuits in Iranian and French law, private law research, 6th year, No. 23. [In Persian]
Hormozi, Khairullah and Seyed Fariduddin Takapo, (2019), Rational requirements of demand, Private Law Research, Year 8, No. 32. [In English]
Jaluzot, B. (2005). Méthodologie du Droit Comparé: Bilan et Prospective. Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé, 57(1), 29-48. [In French]
Lugrand, Pir, (2012), Comparative Law, second edition, translated by Alireza Mohammadzadeh Vadghani, Mizan Legal Foundation.  [In Persian]
Mohseni, Hasan, (2014), Administration of Civil Proceedings Based on Cooperation and within the Framework of Procedural Principles, Tehran: Enteshar co. [In Persian]
Mohseni, Hasan, (2016), French Civil Procedure Code, Vol. 1 Vol. 2, Tehran: Entesharco. [In Persian]
Mohseni, Elaheh, (2019), Methodology of Comparative Law, Comparative Law, Vol. 10, Issue 2. [In Persian]
Scarciglia, R. (2015). A Brief History of Legal Comparison: A Lesson from the Ancient to Post-Modern Times. Beijing L. Rev., 6, 296. [In English]
 
Shahbazinia, Morteza, (2005), The Status of Comparative Law and the Necessity for Revising Its Teaching, Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, No. 34. [In Persian]
Shiravi, Abd- Alhossin, Comparative Law, Second Edition, Samt publishing, 2023. [In Persian]
Smits, Jan M., (2006), Comparative Law and its Influence on National Legal Systems, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford University Press. [In English]
Vahedi, Qadratullah, (2008), The Requirements of Civil Procedure, Tehran: Mizan Publishing. [In Persian]
Wigmore, J. H. (1917). Nova Methodus Discendae Docendaeque Jurisprudentiae. Harvard Law Review, 30(8), 812-829. [In English]
دوره 8، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 16
در حال صفحه آرایی و بارگزاری فایل های PDF
دی 1403
  • تاریخ دریافت: 02 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 20 دی 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 15 بهمن 1402