نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In some contracts, due to some necessity, a condition called the contract extension condition is included, which makes the parties unnecessary to renegotiate or conclude a new contract; However, this privilege is not immune to challenges and was to be counted by a comparative study in French and English legal systems; . However, sometimes, performance the extended contract faced with hardship or impossibility due to changes in contract circumstances, and in some cases, one of the parties abuses its superior position; These cases are actually barrier to implementing the automatic contract extension condition. In English and French law, solutions such as the theories of "Hardship", "Change of Circumstances" (Rebus sic stantibus), "Frustration" and "Force-majeure" and the "Abuse of right” )abus de droit( are used. In the comparative study which was done in analytical-descriptive method and by referring to library sources in Iranian law., it is possible to adhere to general rules such as: “La-Zarar” (no-harm) and " Osr VA Haraj " (rule of hardship), " Ghabne Hades " (sudden deception) and the prohibition of the abuse of the right , to similar solutions with the two legal systems of England and France, such as the modification of the extended contract, and in some cases, the cancellation of the extension condition and non-implementation of the extended contract.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)