آیین دادرسی مراجع شبه قضایی به مثابه حق بنیادین با تأملی در حقوق انگلیس

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران.

2 دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران

چکیده

رعایت دادرسی منصفانه و تنظیم رفتار دادرسی ایجاب می دارد که اصحاب دعوا حقوق خود را در دادرسی بشناسند و مرجع رسیدگی کننده نیز از ضوابط از پیش تهیه شده ی معینی پیروی دارد. رعایت این دو رکن مستلزم وجود مقرراتی در حوزه حقوق شکلی است. از طرفی عدم وجود مقررات شکلی دادرسی همیشه موجب تعدد رویه در رسیدگی خواهد شد و اصحاب پرونده نیز نمی دانند که می بایست پایبند به چه وظایفی باشند تا حقوق ایشان در دادرسی تضییع نشود و به واقع اصل تفوق حقوق به عنوان اصل بنیادین هر دادرسی با چالش مواجه است. این در حالی است که وجود مقررات شکلی از این ابهام و سردرگمی می زداید و تکلیف دو طرف دعوا و همچنین مرجع رسیدگی کننده را مشخص می کند. به عبارت دیگر هم مراجع رسیدگی کننده از شیوه رسیدگی مطلع خواهند بود و هم اصحاب دعوا از حقوق و تکالیف قانونی خود اگاه خواهند شد. پس بدیهی است که آن دادرسی عادلانه تلقی گردیده که ابتدای رسیدگی تا انتهای آن تابع ضوابطی باشد که اصحاب دعوا و مرجع رسیدگی را ملزم به پایبندی و ر عایت ان دارد. از این طریق حقوق هر یک از طرفین تضمین و تکالیف ایشان روشن خواهد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The procedure of quasi-judicial authorities as a fundamental right with a reflection on English law

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saber Jafarnia Osboei 1
  • Abolfazl Dankoob 2
  • Hosein Rahimi Vaskasi 3
1 PhD student in private law, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran.
2 PhD in Private Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran
چکیده [English]

Adhering to a fair trial and regulating the conduct of the trial requires that litigants know their rights in the proceedings, and the investigating authority also follows certain pre-prepared rules. Compliance with these two pillars requires the existence of regulations in the field of procedural rights. On the other hand, the absence of procedural regulations will always cause division in the proceedings, and the parties involved in the case do not know what duties they should adhere to so that their rights are not violated in the proceedings. In fact, the principle of the unity of law as the fundamental principle of any proceeding is challenged. At the same time, the existence of regulations removes some of this ambiguity and confusion, and they specify the duties of both parties to the dispute and the hearing authority. In other words, both the hearing authorities and litigants will be informed about the procedure, and the last one will be aware of their legal rights and duties. Therefore, it is obvious that the proceedings are considered fair if the proceedings from the beginning to the end are subject to the rules that the litigants and the authority are required to adhere to. In this way, the rights of each of the parties and their duties will be assured and clarified. At the same time, it avoids conflict in the course of proceeding.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Procedure
  • quasi-judicial commission
  • formal law
  • administrative procedure
  • administrative authority
Abasi Lahiji,B.(2010). Fundamentals of fundamental rights.Tehran, Javadane Jangal Publishing House, p. 55. [In persian].
Emami, M. & Mosavi, N. (2004). Theoretical foundations of quasi-judicial authorities and their position in Iranian law., Social Sciences and Humanities Quarterly of Shiraz University, Volume 21, Number 2, Law Special Issue, p. 96.[In persian]
Ostovar Sangari,K.(2021). What is administrative proceedings in Iran - proceedings in the administration or proceedings against the administration. Quarterly Journal of New Researches in Administrative Law, second year, fourth issue, p. 153 [In persian]
Hashemi,M. (2006). Human rights and fundamental freedoms.Tehran, Mizan Publications, p.12. In persian].
Hodavand,M. & AqayiToq,M.(2011). Special Administrative Courts. Khorsandi Publishing House, p. 67[In persian].
Hodavand,M .(2011). Comparative administrative law. samat Publications, first edition.[In persian].
Katouzian, N. (2018), Introduction to the science of law, Tehran, Publishing Company.[In persian].
Jaafari Langroudi, J.(1991), Legal Terminology, Chapter 5, GanjDanesh Publications, p. 5.[In persian].
Khalatbari,A. (1966). The necessity of judicial supervision over the decisions of commissions and boards and administrative courts. KanunVakalet publication, No.100.[In persian]
Davodi,H.(2019) . Characteristics of formal rules. Private Law Studies Quarterly, Volume 48, Number 2, Summer, p. 213.[In persian]
Domichel, A.&. Valalumibar, D.(1997). Public Law, (translated from English to Persian by A.Ghazi) Dadgostar Publication.
Rostami,V. & Khosravi,A.(2013).Feasibility of drafting the administrative procedure law. Judicial Law Perspectives Quarterly, No. 65, p. 93.[In persian]
Shabani,Y.(2017). What are quasi-judicial authorities in the opinions of the general board of the Administrative Court of Justice.Quarterly Journal of Public Law Inquiries, No.3. [In persian].
Tabatabai Motmani, M.(2015). Administrative Law, 12th edition, Tehran: Samit Publications, p. 452.[In persian].
Tajarlo,R. & Taqavi, Z. & poshtedar,H.(2014).  The role and function of the commission to deal with disputes arising from national lands from the perspective of the principles of fair proceedings. Public Law Research Quarterly, 17th year, number 49, p. 160.[In persian]
Falahzade,M.(2013).  Developments of the right to be heard in the administrative law of England and Iran. Public Law Research Quarterly, No. 41.[In persian]
Gorgi,A.(2005). The basis and concept of fundamental rights .Basic Rights Journal, No. 2, p. 14.[In persian]
Majdzade ,Gh.(2005). Fair trial concept and mechanism. master's thesis in criminal law and criminology, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, p. 145.[In persian]
Mirmohammadi,P.(2007). Fair trial in the European Court of Human Rights. Master's thesis of International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, AllamehTabatabai University, p.100.[In persian].
Molayi,Y.(2018). Theoretical foundations of the application of fundamental rights in contract law. Comparative Law Studies Quarterly, p. 427.[In persian].
Yavari,A.(2008). The right to a fair trial and new procedure.Basic Rights Journal, 2nd year, 2nd issue, p. 252.[In persian].
Yasrebi,A.&Arian,M.(2022).  The intervention of the government in private contracts based on the theory of the impact of fundamental rights on contract rights , Islamic Law Quarterly, 18th year, No. 68, p. 263.[In persian].
Zaret,A & Zaret,M.(2021), independence of administrative proceedings, Simultaneous proceedings in the judicial and administrative authority Scientific Quarterly of Modern Administrative Law Research, Year 3 / Number 6 . .[In persian].
Khosravi,A.(2013), Pathology of administrative authorities in Iran and the procedural records of the unit of comparative study with English law, doctoral dissertation of public law, University of Tehran, Qom campus. .[In persian].
Najabatkhah ,M & Afshari,F &Mousavizadeh,S.(2016), Pathology of the Structure and Powers of Special Administrative Authorities in Iranian Administrative Law, Judicial Law Perspectives Quarterly No. 77 and 78, Pages 199 to 224 . .[In persian].
The right of citizens to sue and its echo in the constitution Dr. Faridun Nahrini special letter on the pretext of the anniversary of the issuance of the Charter of Citizens' Rights The right of citizens to sue and its echo in the constitution. .[In persian].
Mohseni, H,(2022). the right to sue according to the Disciplinary Council of the Organization of Engineering and Building Control System, Legal Studies Quarterly. .[In persian].
Jafari Langroodi,J.(1991). Legal terminology. Chapter 5, GanjDanesh Publications, p. 5.[In persian].
Dumichele, A.&.Vellalomieber, D.(1997) Public Law.(Translated from English to Persian by A.Qazi).Tehran:PublishingDadgostar.
Shidfar, Z.(1966). public and administrative law, Volume II, Tehran: Tehran University Press, p. 304.[In persian].
Tabatabae Motameni,M.(1995) Administrative rights. second edition, Semt Publications, p. 452. [In persian].
Ghamami, M &  Mohseni, H.( 2016), Transnational Civil Procedure Code, 4th Edition Publishing Company. .[In persian].
Shariati, M.(2022), Review of tax proceedings in Iran's legal system based on the principles of fair proceedings, Majd Publications, Vol. 1. .[In persian].
 
 
Galligan,D,J,(1996), Due Process and Fair Procedure, A study of Administrative procedures , Clarendon press, oxford
Cane, peter, (1996),An Introduction to Administrative Law,Clarendon press.
De smith, S. A,(1995),Judicial Reviow of Administracive Action.
Cappelli, M & Brian J. Garth (2018) Civil Procedure (Introduction-Policies, Trends and Thoughts in Civil Procedure), Volume One of Volume 13 of the International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, translated and researched by Dr. Hassan Mohseni, Tehran: Company Stock issue.
RT Hon Maurice Kay and Stuart Sime and Derek French, (  2015). Blackstone’s Civil Practice, Oxford, P 5.