نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران.
2 دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
3 استادیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Adhering to a fair trial and regulating the conduct of the trial is required that litigants know their rights in the proceedings and the investigating authority also follows certain pre-prepared rules.
Compliance with these two pillars requires the existence of regulations in the field of formal rights.
On the other hand, the absence of procedural regulations will always cause division in the proceedings and the parties involved in the case do not know what duties they should adhere to so that their rights are not violated in the proceedings. In fact, the principle of the unity of law as the fundamental principle of any proceedings is challenged. At the same time, the existence of regulations removes some of this ambiguity and confusion and it specifies the duty of both parties to the dispute as well as the hearing authority. In other words, both the hearing authorities will be informed about the procedure and litigants will be aware of their legal rights and duties. Therefore, it is obvious that the proceedings are considered to be fair if the proceedings from the beginning to the end are subject to the rules that the litigants and the consolidation authority are required to adhere to. In this way, the rights of each of the guarantee parties and their duties will be clarified. At the same time, it avoids conflict in the course of proceedings
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)
