بررسی تطبیقی سازش در قانون آیین دادرسی مدنی فراملی و حقوق ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.

2 دانشجوی مقطع دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.

چکیده

سازش به‌عنوان یکی از شیوه‌های مؤثر حل‌‌وفصل اختلافات از دیرباز مورد توجه قرار داشته و به قوانین کشورهای مختلف ورود نموده است. در همین راستا قانون آیین دادرسی مدنی فراملی که با هدف تبیین مفاهیم اصلی عنصر حیاتی عدالت در نظام‌های حقوقی مختلف دنیا و در نهایت ارائه قانونی مدون، خاصه در زمینه‌ی دعاوی بازرگانی بین‌المللی که قابل تسری به سایر اختلافات حقوق مدنی نیز می‌باشد، پا به عرصه وجود نهاده، به حل‌وفصل اختلافات از طریق برقراری صلح و سازش اهتمام ویژه ورزیده است. پیشنهاد سازش در مقررات یادشده در صورتی‌که بدون علت موجه مورد پذیرش قرار نگیرد با ضمانت اجرای قانونی همراه خواهد بود که این امر با فلسفه وجودی سازش در تعارضی آشکار قرار دارد. قانون‌گذار ایران نیز در قوانین مختلف به حل اختلاف از طریق سازش توجه نموده و حتی قانون خاصی تحت عنوان شورای حل اختلاف برای احیاء و اشاعه فرهنگ صلح و سازش وضع نموده است. با توجه به مزایای بسیار حل‌وفصل اختلافات از طریق سازش، مقاله حاضر با تمسک به روش توصیقی- تحلیلی و با استفاده از مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای درصدد بررسی تطبیقی سازش در قانون آیین دادرسی مدنی فراملی و قوانین کشور ایران است تا ضمن بیان انطباق قوانین یاد شده وجوه افتراق آنان نیز مشخص شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparative Study of Compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Law and the Iranian Law

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamid Abhari 1
  • Mehdi Taleqan Ghafari 2
  • Seyed tahere Moosavi khatir 2
1 Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
2 PhD Student in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Compromise has long been considered as one of the most effective procedures of settling disputes in the laws of different countries. In this regard, the Transnational Civil Procedure Code has entered the field of existence with the aims of explaining the basic concepts of the justice vital elements in various legal systems of the world and ultimately providing a codified law, especially in the field of international commercial litigation which can be extended to other civil law disputes. It has also paid special attention to resolving disputes through peace and reconciliation. If the proposed compromise of the mentioned law is not accepted without a justifiable excuse, it will be accompanied by a legal sanction, which is clearly in conflict with the philosophy of compromise. The Iranian legislature has paid attention to resolving disputes through compromise in various laws, and has even enacted a special law called the Law on Dispute Settlement Councils to revive and spread the culture of peace and compromise. Considering the several benefits of settling disputes through compromise, the present article seeks to make a comparative study of compromise in the Transnational Civil Procedure Code and the Iranian law using a descriptive-analytical method and library studies to express the compliance of the mentioned laws and determine the differences between them.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Transnational Civil Procedure
  • National
  • Alternative dispute resolution methods
  • Peace and reconciliation
  • Iranian law

مراجع

  1. Aali Panah, A., Ziar, M. (2017). A Comparative Study of the Compromise Institution in Iranian Law and International Trade Law, Journal of Legal Education of Govah, Vol. 3, No.2 (5). (In Persian).

2.Abhari, H., Barzegar M. R. (2012). Civil Procedure 1, Claims and Jurisdictions, Babolsar :University of Mazandaran. (In Persian).

3.Ahmadvand, Khalilullah and Maghami, Rostam. (1400). A Comparative Study of the Compromise Institution in Iranian and Egyptian Law, Qanun Yar Scientific-Legal Quarterly, Volume 5 - Number 17. (In Persian).

4.Bahta, Tecle Hagos.(2019). Amicable Dispute Resolution in Civil and Commercial Matters in Ethiopia: Negotiation, Conciliation and Compromise, MIZAN LAW REVIEW, Vol. 13, No.1,1-30

5.CĂBULEA MAY ,simon. (2018). COMPROMISE IN NEGOTIATION, American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, Vol. 59,150-166.

6.C. Hazard, Jr. Jr , Geoffrey @Taruffo, Michele. (1997). Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure Rules and Commentary, Cornell International Law Journal,vol 30.493-539.

7.C. Hazard, Geoffrey. (2001). Introduction to the Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLITIC,vol33,769-784.

8.C. Hazard Jr., Geoffrey. (2001). Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLITICS,vol33,793-859.

  1. Darwish Hoveyda, Y. (2014). Alternative methods of dispute settlement (2nd ed.), Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian).
  2. Ghomami, M., Mohseni, H. (2006). Principles Ensuring Democratic Performance in trial and Principles Related to the Characteristics of Civil Procedure, Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, No. 24. (In Persian).
  3. Ghomami, M., Mohseni, H. (2017). Transnational Civil Procedure (4th ed.),Tehran: Enteshar Co. (In Persian).
  4. Hayati, A.A. (2013). Civil Procedure in the Current Legal Order (4th ed.), Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian).
  5. Hazard Jr, G. C. (1998). Preliminary Draft of the ALI Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure.Tex. Int'l LJ, 33, 489.
  6. Hosseini, H. (2010). A Comparative Study of Compromise in Iranian and American Law,Unpublished manuscript, M.Sc. Thesis in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabai University. (In Persian).
  7. Hosseini, S. M., Safarzadeh, D., Amirpour, H. (2011). Analysis of jurisprudential and legal principles of the Dispute Settlement Council and similar institutions, Tehran:Scientific and Cultural Publications. (In Persian).
  8. Hurr al-Amili, M.H. (2018). Wasa'il al-Shia(2nd ed.).Qom: Aal Al-Bayt Institute, vol.13. (In Persian).
  9. Jafari Langroudi, M. J. (2014). Legal Terminology (25th ed.). Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh Publication. (In Persian).

18.J. COHEN,amy. (2018). ON COMPROMISE, NEGOTIATION, AND LOSS, American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, Vol. 59,100-149

  1. Johnson, I. (1997). Redefining the concept of governance. Political and Social Policies Divison, Canadian International Development Agency.
  2. Katozian, Naser (2013). Introductory course of civil law, legal practices: unilateral –contract (10th ed.),Tehran: Enteshar Publishing Co. (In Persian).
  3. Khalesi, M.(2008). Jurisdictions of proceeding in Dispute Settlement Councils, Qom:Judiciary Publishing.(In Persian).
  4. Krishan, R. (2004). Overview of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, An. J. Int'l Arb.21, 263.

23. Maboudi Neyshabouri, Reza and Rezaei, Alireza. (1400). A Comparative Study of Compromise in Family Lawsuits in the Singapore Convention 2019, Iranian Law and Imami Jurisprudence, Scientific-Cultural-Educational Journal of Women and Family, 16th year, No. 55. (In Persian).

  1. Main, T. O. (2005). ADR: the new equity, 74 U. Cin. L. Rev, 329, 391.
  2. Mosta'jeran, E. (2013). Comparative study of compromise in litigation in Iranian and British law, M.Sc. Thesis in Private Law, Faculty of Law, Qom University. (In Persian).
  3. Parker, J. S. (2009). Comparative Civil Procedure and Transnational'Harmonization': A Law-and-Economics Perspective. In Travemunder Symposium on the Economic Analysis of Procedural Law(pp. 09-03).

27.Pourastad, Majid. (1400).  Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure, Tehran: Shahre Danesh Institute for Legal Studies and Research. (In Persian).

  1. Safaei, S.H. (2012). Civil Law Basic Course: General Rules of Contracts (13th ed.), Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian).
  2. Safaei, S.H., Emami, A. (2012). Brief Family Law (33rd ed.), Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian).
  3. Shahidi, M. (2011). Civil Law 3- Obligations (15th ed.), Tehran: Majd. (In Persian).
  4. Shams, A. (2013). Civil Procedure (Advanced Course)(24th ed.), Tehran: Derak, Vol. 3. (In Persian).

32.Sinai, Yuval @ Alberstein , Micbai.(2014). COURT ARBITRATION BY COMPROMISE: RETHINKING DELAWARE'S STATE SPONSORED ARBITRATION CASE, CARDOZO PUB. LAW, POLICY &ETHICS J. Vol. 13,739-764.

  1. Sir Naraja,M. (2004). Bilateral Investment Agreements (T. Tavakol Habibzadeh,Trans.), Legal Journal of the Office of International Legal Services of the Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 30.
  2. Stychin, C. F. Mulcahy, L. & Mulcahy, L. (1999). Legal method: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell.
  3. Rist, S. Chidambaranathan, M. Escobar, C. Wiesmann, U. & Zimmermann, A. (2007). Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of rural studies, 23(1), 23-37.
  4. Taleghan Ghaffari, M.(2018). Jurisdiction of the Dispute Settlement Council in legal litigations, Unpublished manuscript, M.Sc. Thesis in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran. (In Persian).
  5. Taruffo, M. (2006). Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure: An Evidentiary Epistemology. Penn St. Int'l L. Rev.25, 509.
  6. Tweeddale, A. & Tweeddale, K. (2005). Arbitration of commercial disputes: international and English law and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. The International Institute for the Unification of Private Law and the American Law Institute (2013). Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure (M. Pour Ostad) (3rd ed.). Tehran: Shahr-e-Danesh Institute of Law Research & Study.
  8. Vahedi, Q.A. (2003). Requirements of Civil Procedure (3rd ed.), Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian).

41.Walker, Janet.(2001). The Utility of the ALI/UNIDROIT Project on Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure, niform Law Review. Volume 6, Issue 4,803-818.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 02 شهریور 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 18 فروردین 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 13 خرداد 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار