نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار گروه حقوق دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایران، اراک.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Adhesion contract is A standard of contract drafted by one party and offered to other party, who must adhere to the contract and therefore does not have the power to negotiate the terms of the contract and only can "take it or leave it" .many of insurance(not all of them) contract are adhesion contract. Insurer with stronger bargaining power, According to the requirements of the insurance industry, standardized or drafted terms and conditions in the form of contract, and insured only can accept or reject it . for nature of this contracts, some times, there are vague , suprising and conscionable terms in this contract. In This paper , ways of protcting of insured in us law in this contract introduced, including cotra proferentem, rule of esstopel, doctrine uncoscionable contract or terms and principle of reasonable expectation and then be cosidered to what extent these methods are applicable in Iran law.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
کتابنامه
منابع فارسی:
1.افتخار جهرمی؛شهبازی نیا، مرتضی،بررسی قاعده استاپل در حقوق انگلیس و آمریکا«،نشریه حقوقی دفتر خدمات حقوقی بین المللی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، شماره 11 ،1383.
2.شهیدی، مهدی، حقوق مدنی 3 (تعهدات)، چاپ دوازدهم انتشارات مجد، ؛تهران، 1387.
3.شهیدی،مهدی، تشکیل قراردادها و تعهدات، چاپ سوم،انتشارت مجد، تهران، 1382.
4.شیروی، عبدالحسین،«قراردادهای استاندارد(الحاقی) در حقوق کامن لو با تاکید بر حقوق انگلستان و آمریکا»، مجله مجتمع اموزش عالی قم،سال چهارم،شماره دوازدهم، بهار1381.
منابع انگلیسی:
6.Allen Reames , The Adhesion Contract ofInsurance, 5 Santa Clara Law,1964.
7.David J. Seno, Spring 2002, The Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations in Insurance Law: What to Expect in Wisconsin, 85 Marquette Law Review.
8.David Goodhue,The Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations in Massachusetts and New Hampshire: A Comparative Analysis, 17 New England Law Review, 1991.
9.Douglas Fadel, Utah Rejects the Reasonable Expectations Doctrine in Insurance Contract Interpretation, 1993 Utah Law Review, 1993.
10.Duncan, Ed E,The Demise of Contra Proferentem as the Primary Rule of Insurance Contract Interpretation in Ohio and Elsewhere, 41 Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, Summer 2006.
13.Frank Gardner, ,Reasonable Expectations: Evolution Completed or Revolution Begun?, 669 Insurance Law Journal ,1978.
14.Gary L.Birnbaum,Standardized Agreements and the Parole Evidence Rule: Defining and Applying the Erpectations Principle, 26 Arizona. Law Review,1984.
15.H. Walter Croskey,The Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations in California: A Judge's View, 5 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 1998-1999.
16.Holmes, A Contextual Study of Commercial Good Faith: Good-Faith Disclosure in Co ntract Formation, 39 University of Pittsburgh Law Review , 1978.
17.Horton, David, Flipping the Script, Contra Proferentem and Standard Form Contracts , 80 University of Colorado Law Review,2009.
18.James M. Fischer,The Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations Is Indispensable, If Only We Knew Wbat For?, Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 1998-1999 .
19.James M. Fischer,Why Are Insurance Policies Subject to Special Rules of Interpretation?: Text versus Context, 24 Arizona State Law Journal, 1992.
20.Jeffrey W. Stempel,Stempel on Insurance Contracts, Aspen Publishers Online,2006.
21.Je Minnock,Protecting,the insured from adhesion insurance policy: the doctrine of reasonable expectations in utahUtah Law Review, 1991 .
26.Kenneth J. Homer Jr.,Insurance-Contracts-The Ambiguity in the Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations, 62 Notre Dame Law Review, 1986.
27.Kessler,Contracts of Adhesion-Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract,43 Columbia Law Review , 1943.
28.Laurie Kindell Fett,The Reasonable Expectations Doctrine: An Alternative to Bending and Stretching Traditional Rules of Contract Interpretation, 18 William Mitchell Law Review, 1992.
29.Mark C. Rahdert,Reasonable expectations revised, 5 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, 1998-1999.
30.Michelle E. Boardman,Contra proferentem: the allure of ambigiuous boilerplate, 104Michigan Law Review , 2006.
31.Nancy E. Matteuzzi,Reasonable Expectations Approach to Insurance Contract Interpretation Modified in Missouri-- Estrin Construction Co. v.Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.,47 Missouri Law Review,1982.
33..Robert H. Jerry II,Insurance, Contract, and the Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations, Connecticut Insurance Law Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1. , 1998.
36.Robert E. Keeton, Insurance Law Rightsat Variance with Policy Provisions (Parts I and H), 83 HIA-v. L. Rev. , 1970.
37.Robert E. Keeton, 1976,Reasonable Expectations in the Second Decade, 12 FORUM , 1976.
38.Scott G. Johnson,resoliving ambiguities in insurance policy language: the contra proferentem doctrine and use of extrinsic evidence, 33 Brief, 2003-2004 .
39.Slawson,Mass Contracts: Lawful Fraud in California, 48 S. California Law Review, 1974 .
40.Susan Randall,Freedom of contract in insurance law, Conecticut insurance law journal, 2008.
41.Telford Hollman, Insurance as a Contract of Adhesion, Insurance Law Journal ,1978.
42.Todd D. Rakoff,Contracts of Adhesion: An Essay in Reconstruction, 96 Harvard Law. Review, , 1983.
)
