A Comparative Study of the Impact of Frustration of the Cause of Obligation on the Continuity of Successive Contracts in Iranian and French Law

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Associate Professor. Department of Private Law. Faculty of Law and Political Science. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Mashhadd, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

In contract law, the purpose of concluding a contract is called cause, which may be legitimate or illegitimate. The article employs a descriptive and analytical method, utilizing a comparative approach to demonstrate that prior to the 2016 reforms of the French Civil Code, cause was a fundamental element of a contract. The absence of cause would result in the invalidation of one of the essential terms of the contract, thereby disrupting the contractual balance to the detriment of one of the parties. The prevailing doctrine and jurisprudence in France have regarded the legal status of caducité (nullity) of a contract as a means to address difficulties. Despite the removal of the concept of cause from the French Civil Code, many scholars still rely on the first part of Article 1186 of the French Civil Code, which was approved in 2016, as opinions on this matter remain consistent. While there is significant disagreement regarding the impact of the termination of a legitimate cause on the survival of the contract under Iranian law, this essay demonstrates that, in Iranian law, the legitimate cause or purpose of a contract that creates a difficult situation for one of the parties can lead to the termination of the contract. However, some scholars advocate for the option to terminate the contract in such circumstances.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Adl, M. (1378). Civil law, Qazvin: Taha Publications. (In Persian)
Ancel, P. (2022). the law of obligations. Paris: Dalloz (In French).
Bigdeli, S., & Osanloo, A. (1401). A comparative study of contract lapse in French and Iranian law. Private Law research, Vol 10, Issue 38, pp. 9-44. (In Persian)
Buffelan-Lanore, Y., & Larribau-Terneyre, V. (2023). Civil Law. The obligations. Paris: Sirey (In French).
Cabrillac, R. (2018). the law of obligations. Paris: Dalloz (In French).
Capitant, H. (1927). the cause of obligations (Contracts, unilateral engagements). Paris: Dalloz (In French).
Cornu, G. (2018). Vocabulaire juridique. Paris: PUF (In French).
Dayani, A. (1395). Iranian Law of Contracts. Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation. (In Persian)
Debard, T., & Guinchard, S. (2017- 2018) Lexicon of legal terms. Paris: Dalloz (In French)
Delebecque, P., & Pansier, F. J. (2016). the law of obligations, Contract and quasi-contract. Paris: LexisNexis (In French).
Demogue, R. (1923). Treatise on obligations in general (Vol. 1). Paris: Rousseau (In French).
Demogue, R. (1923). Treatise on obligations in general (Vol. 2). Paris: Rousseau (In French).
Eftekhari, J. (1395). Civil Law, Obligation Law and Introduction to Contract Law. Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation. (In Persian)
Fages, B. (2019). the law of obligations. Paris: LGDJ (In French).
Flour, J., Aubert, J. L., & Savaux, É. (2022). Civil Law. The Obligations, Volume 1. The legal act. Paris: Sirey (In French).
Ghabooli dorafshan, S. M. H., fakhlaei, M. T., & haeri, M. H. (2016). The Remedy of Contracts with Illegal Purpose as a Means to Protect Traditional and Economic Public Policy. Encyclopedia of Economic Law Journal, 23(9), 1-29. (In Persian)
Ghaffari Farsani, B. (1389). Frustration of Purpose and Its Effect on Contractual Relationship with A Comparative Study on American and Iranian Law. Law Quarterly, Vol 40, Issue 101, pp. 219 - 238 (In Persian)
Ghasemi hamed, A. (1393). Civil law, Basic conditions of contract formation. Tehran, Derak Publications. (In Persian)
Ghestin, J. (2007). Cause of engagement and validity of the contract. Paris: LGDJ (In French).
Ghestin, J. (2013). The Formation of the Contract Volume 2: The Object and the Cause – Nullities. Paris: LGDJ (In French).
Jafari Langrudi, M. J. (1367). The Terminology of Law, Tehran: Ganj'e Danesh Publications. (In Persian)
Jafari Langrudi, M. J. (1387). The Terminology of Law, Tehran: Ganj'e Danesh Publications. (In Persian)
Jafari Langrudi, M. J. (1390). Obligations Law, Tehran: Ganje Danesh Publications. (In Persian)
Josserand, L. (1939). General theory of obligations; The main contracts of civil law; The sureties. Paris: Recueil Sirey (In French).
Katouzian, N. (1378). Iranian Civil Law: Specific Contracts: Vol. 1, Translative Contracts: Sale, Barter, Rent, Loan. Tehran: Ganj'e Danesh Publications. (In Persian)
Katouzian, N. (1380). Iranian Civil Law: Specific Contracts: Vol. 3, Tehran: Ganj'e Danesh Publications. (In Persian)
Katouzian, N. (1383). General Principles of Contracts: Formation and Validity, Legal Sanctions. Vol.2, Tehran: Behnashr Publication. (In Persian)
Katouzian, N. (1390). Juristic Acts. Contracts, Unilateral Acts. Tehran, Enteshar Publication Co. (In Persian)
Katouzian, N. (1393). General Principles of Contracts: Effects of Contract, Vol.3, Tehran: Enteshar Publication Co. (In Persian)
Khatib, A., Falah, M. R., & Tavallaei, A. (2018). The Jurisprudential and Legal Foundations of the Theory of Judicial Modification of Contracts in the Legal System of Iran and Egypt. Islamic Law Research Journal, 19(47), 133-154. (In Persian)
Mazeaud, D. (2013). The cause, a notion in the wind...: note under Com. 23 oct. 2012. Dalloz collection (10), 686-690. (In French).
Mazeaud, D. (2015). The disappearance of the cause of a unilateral commitment of will Dalloz collection (40), 2361 (In French).
Mazeaud, H., Mazeaud, L., Mazeaud, J., & Chabas, F. (1998). Lessons of Civil Law. 2, 1. The Obligations: General theory. Paris: Montchrestien (In French).
Mohaghegh Damad, M. (1382). A Study of Islamic Jurisprudence with Respect to Family Law: Marriage and Its Termination. Tehran: Oloom eslami Publication. (In Persian)
Pellé, S. (2007). The notion of contractual interdependence. Contribution to the study of contracts groups. Paris: Dalloz (In French).
Planiol, M. (1908). Basic civil law treatise. Paris: General library of law and jurisprudence. (In French).
Qabuli Dorafshan, M. H. (1396). Assisting in haram in the jurisprudence of contracts. Tehran, Mizan Legal Foundation. (In Persian)
Qabuli Dorafshan, M. M., & Mohseni. S. (1391). The General Theory of Nullity in Contracts. Tehran: Jungle Publications. (In Persian)
Sadeghi Moghaddam, M. H. (1379). A comparative study of "the effect of changing conditions on the contract" and the solution of Iranian Law. International Law Review, Volume 18, Issue 25, pp. 161-222 (In Persian)
Sadeghi Moghaddam, M. H. (1390). The Change in Circumstances of Contract. Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation. (In Persian)
Safai, S. H. (1386). Articles on Civil Law and Comparative Law. Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation. (In Persian)
Safai, S. H. (1391). elementary course of civil law, general principles of contracts. Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation. (In Persian)
Shahidi, M. (1387). Civil Law: Contract Stipulations. Vol 4, Tehran: Majd Publication Co. (In Persian)
Shahidi, M. (1388). Civil Law: Principles of Contracts and Obligations: Vol. 2, Tehran: Majd Publication Co. (In Persian)
Shiravi, A. (1396). Contract Law: Conclusion, Effects and Termination. Tehran: SAMT. (In Persian)
Tahami, S. H., Qabuli Dorafshan, S. M. M., Mohseni, S., & Ansari, A. (1401). Legal and economic analysis of the effect of pandemic diseases on the performance of contractual obligations. Encyclopedia of Economic Law Journal, 29(21), 10-49. (In Persian)
Terré, F., Simler, P., Lequette, Y., & Chénedé, F. (2018). Civil law. the law of obligations. Paris: Dalloz (In French).