Analysis of Rights Arising from accounts of Social networks in employee and employer relations (with Emphasizing on The U.S.A law)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Private and Islamic Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Master of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Today, social networks play an important role in the development of various occupations. To this end, employers hire employees who are familiar with the field to promote their products in cyberspace by opening an account in these networks. Basically, after the termination of the employment relationship, according to the financial value of the accounts, there is a dispute over various issues, including the issue of the owner of the account. The main question is who is the owner of the account? The laws of different countries, such as Iran and the United States, are neutral on this issue which has added to the complexity of the issue. However, to solve this challenge, various approaches have been proposed by thinkers, which are: Trade secret approach, contract law, intellectual property rights and finally the right of publicity. These approaches have all been developed in the context of American law. In recent years, most cases conflict with the ownership of the account when they refer to the courts. In Iranian legal literature, this issue has been less discussed. According to the Western legal literature, In the present article an attempt is made to examine the issue of ownership of accounts in social networks in a descriptive-analytical manner. In this way, two theories of “will” and then “labor” will be introduced as tools to identify the account holder in the Iranian legal system. In order to determine the main owner of the account, the judge should examine the explicit or implicit will of the employees and employers based on these theories. In the next step, the judge can refer to the custom; and finally, it is possible to determine the owner based on the labor theory; That is, a person who has caused the prosperity of the financial value of the account. Also, if none of the methods help, the last way is to rule on the joint ownership of the disputing parties.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Adornato, A. C., & Horsfall, A. S. (2019). Failed Strategy: Using Trade Secret Laws to Assert Ownership of Employees' Social Media Accounts in the Journalism Industry. NYU J. Intell. Prop. & Ent. L., 9, pp. 62-90.
Araqi, Z. (2000). Hashiyat-Al-Makaseb. Qom: Al-Qafour. (In Arabic)
Argento, Z. (2012). Whose Social Network Account: A Trade Secret Approach to Allocating Rights. Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev., 19, pp. 201-278.
Casetext, “Phonedog v. Kravitz” Nov, 2011, (last visited 16 June 2022). Available at: https://casetext.com/case/phonedog-v-kravitz.
Coe, P., & Brown, J. (2019). What’s in a Name? The Case for Protecting the Reputation of Businesses under Article 1 Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Journal of European Tort Law, 10(3), pp. 286-315.
Cohen, A. L. (2015). Damage Control: The Adoption of the Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act in Texas. Est. Plan. & Cmty. Prop. LJ, 8, pp. 317-341.
Computerhope, “User account” December, 2020, (last visited 16 June 2022). Available at: https://www.computerhope.com/jargon/u/useracco.htm.
Darrow, J. J., & Ferrera, G. R. (2006). Who Owns a Decedents E-Mails: Inheritable Probate Assets or Property of the Network. NYUJ Legis. & Pub. Pol'y, 10, pp. 281-320.
Edwards, L., & Harbina, E. (2013). Protecting post-mortem privacy: Reconsidering the privacy interests of the deceased in a digital world. Cardozo Arts & Ent. LJ, 32, pp. 83-129.
Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), pp. 210-230.
Evans, M. (2019). Trade Secret Status for Business Customer Lists Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop., 21, pp. 21-33.
Fairfield, J. A. (2005). Virtual property. BUL Rev., 85, pp. 1047-1102.
Ferrante, R. E. (2013). The Relationship between Digital Assets and Their Transference at Death: It's Complicated. Loy. J. Pub. Int. L., 15, pp. 37-61.
Fisk, C. L. (2003). Authors at work: The origins of the work-for-hire doctrine. Yale JL & Human., 15, pp. 1-70.
Furlong, M. (2013). Putting a Price on Friendship: Examining the Ownership Battle between a Business' Social Media Networks, and the Humans That Operate Them. J. Marshall L. Rev., 47, pp. 745-768.
Green, J. (2015). Trade Secrets and Data Security: A Proposed Minimum Standard of Reasonable Data Security Efforts When Seeking Trade Secret Protection for Consumer Information. Cumb. L. Rev., 46, pp. 181-218.
Halperin, B. (2019). Why Do You Want My Password: Assessing Ultimate Control of a Journalist's Twitter Account Used for Work Purposes. Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. LJ, 30, pp. 325-392.
Instagram, “Terms of Use” January, 2013, (last visited 17 June 2022). Available at: https://www.instagram.com/about/legal/terms/before-january-19-2013/.
Jamel, A. L. (2016). Mixing Business with Pleasure: Evaluating the Blurred Line between the Ownership of Business and Personal Social Media Accounts under Sec. 541 (A)(1). Emory Bankr. Dev. J., 33, pp. 561-598.
Kolansky, R. J. (2013). Can we Really Ascribe a Dollar amount to Interpersonal Communication-How Phonedog v. Kravitz may Decide who Owns a Twitter Account. Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports LJ, 20, pp. 133-166.
Leeson, P. A. (2016). How Many# Followers Do You Have: Evaluating the Rise of Social Media and Issues concerning in re CTLI's Determination That Social Media Accounts Are Property of the Estate. Cath. UL Rev., 66, pp. 499-523.
LinkedIn, “User Agreement” February, 2022, (last visited 16 June 2022). Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/legal/user-agreement.
Mali, P., & Prakash G, A. (2019). Death in the era of PerPetual Digital afterlife: Digital assets, Posthumous legacy, ownershiP anD its legal imPlications. National Law School Journal.
McGarvey Hidy, K. (2018). Business Disputes Over Social Media Accounts: Legal Rights, Judicial Rationales, and the Resultant Business Risks. Colum. Bus. L. Rev., pp. 426-494.
McGarvey Hidy, K. (2021). Let Them Eat Cake: Social Media Accounts Property Rights, and the Digital Rights Revolution. DePaul Law Review, 71(1), pp. 47-86.
McKenna, M. P. (2005). The Right of Publicity and Autonomous Self-Definition. U. Pitt. L. Rev., 67, pp. 225-294.
McLaughlin, H. (2015). You're Fired: Pack Everything but Your Social Media Passwords. Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop., 13, vii, pp. 87-116.
McNealy, J. (2013). Who Owns Your Friends: Phonedog v. Kravitz and Business Claims of Trade Secret in Social Media Information. Rutgers Computer & Tech. LJ, 39, pp. 30-55.
Miao, T. A. (2012). Access denied: how social media accounts fall outside the scope of intellectual property law and into the realm of the computer fraud and abuse act. Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. LJ, 23, pp. 1017-1062.
Mirhosseini, S. H.(2017). Law of Patents. Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian)
Mirshekari, A & Fattahi ketilate, A. (2021). The will of digital accounts. Journal of Legal Research, 20(47), pp. 165-194. (In Persian)
Mirshekari, A. (2019). Inheritance of Virtual Accounts. Journal of Civil Law   Knowledge, 7(2), pp. 71-90. (In Persian)
Mirshekari, A.(2019). The Right of Publicity. Private Law Studies Quarterly, 49(3), pp. 523-542. (In Persian)
Mitchel, C. J.(2014). Keep your friends close: a framework for addressing rights to social media contacts. Vand. L. Rev., 67, pp. 1459-1495.
Moore, C. A.(2017). Find Out Who Your Friends Are: A Framework for Determining Whether Employees' Social Media Followers Follow Them to a New Job. Campbell L. Rev., 39, pp. 493-520.
Nekit, K.(2020). Social media account as an object of virtual property. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 14(2), pp. 201-226.
Park, S., & Abril, P. S.(2016). Digital Self-Ownership: A Publicity-Rights Framework for Determining Employee Social Media Rights. Am. Bus. LJ, 53, pp. 537-598.
Pillsbury's Internet & Social Media Team, “Can a Reporter’s Twitter Account Be a Newspaper’s Trade Secret?” August, 2018, (last visited 16 June 2022). Available at: https://www.internetandtechnologylaw.com/reporter-twitter-account-trade-secret/.
Qabuli Dorafshan, M.M, Danesh Nari, H.R & Saatchi, A. (2013). Comparative Study of Civil and Criminal Protection of Trade Secrets in America and Iranian Legal Systems. Journal Encyclopedia of Economic Law., 20(4), pp. 104-133. (In Persian)
Rivard, P. M. (1997). Protection of Business Investments in Human Capital: Shop Right and Related Doctrines. J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y, 79, pp. 753-763.
Sadeghi, M & Kabiri Shah Abad, H.(2018). The comparative study of the rights of ownership of employee’s invention in case the parties remain silent in contract in Iran and US law. Journal of Comparative Intellectual Property Law Researches. 1(1), pp. 26-57. (In Persian)
Safai, S. A. & Hoseini, S. E.(2021).Précis de Droit Civil ; Personnes et Biens. Tome 1. Téhéran : édition Mizan. (In Persian)
Sprague, R.(2013).No Surfing Allowed: A Review & Analysis of Legislation Prohibiting Employers from Demanding Access to Employees'& Job Applicants' Social Media Accounts. Alb. LJ Sci. & Tech., 24, pp. 481-513.
Techopedia,“What Does User Account Mean?” May, 2022,(last visited 16 June 2022). Available at: https://www.techopedia.com/definition/13458/user-account.
Twitter,“Terms of Service” June, 2022,(last visited 17 June 2022).Available at: https://twitter.com/en/tos.
Walker, A. S.(2012).Who Owns Your Social Media Account?. NY Business Law Journal, 16.
Journal of Comparative Law
Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 10
October 2022
Pages 243-263

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 October 2021
  • Revise Date: 29 January 2022
  • Accept Date: 16 March 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics