From the Distinction between Friend and Enemy to the Manifestation of Concrete Will: Schmitt's Sovereignty in the Dialectic of the Political and the Legal

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Prof, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of International Law., Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Ignoring the political aspect of sovereignty forms a significant part of the legal and political discourse. But, Schmitt teaches us that the ruler's ability to set aside legal norms when an exception occurs, rather than using authority through these norms, constitutes the essence of sovereignty. We should understand this Schmittian doctrine in the context of his understanding of the Constituent power. The power's concrete will and the ruler's representation decide the constitutional law and written constitution. The meaning of constitutionalism lies in its concrete reality, not in norms above this will. Constitutional norms have no authority other than this will. To understand the ruler's decision-making in exceptional circumstances, we must view it through Schmitt's idea of sovereignty. The center of sovereignty is based on a representative of the constituent power. The ruler acts as a representative of this power using sovereign authority. To achieve a correct understanding of the system of constitutional law, one must consider sovereignty and emphasize its political aspect; this article analyzes sovereignty from Schmitt's perspective and emphasizes that claiming to limit sovereignty through written norms leads to misunderstandings of sovereignty and constitutional law. This article shows that analyzing sovereignty through Schmitt's concept is important. It helps us understand political and legal thought better and avoid confusion.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Agamben, G. (1395). State of Exception, translation by Poya Imani, Tehran: Ney Publishing, first edition.  In Persian 
Cristi, R. (2011). “Schmitt on Constituent Power and the Monarchical Principle”, Constellations, Volume 18, No 3, pp.352-364.
Dyzenhaus, D. (2015). “Kelsen, Heller, and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought”, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, Volume. 16, No 2, pp.337-366.
Fiorenza, F. S. (2005). “Political Theology and the Critique of Modernity: Facing the Challenges of the Present”, Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, No 10, pp. 87-105.
Harding, A. (2001). Medieval Law and the Foundations of the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heidari, A. & kavandi, R. (1395). “The Political Theology and the Exception: Carl Schmitt and the Problem of Sovereignty”, Philosophy, No. 44(1), pp. 33-49. In Persian 
Held, D. (1394). “The Formation of the Modern State”, In Stuart Hall & Bram Gibbon (Ed). An Introduction to the Understanding of Modern Society, Book 1: Forms of Modernity, (pp. 113-174) translated by Mahmoud Mothahid and Others, Agah Publication, second edition. In Persian 
Hinsley, F. H. (1986). Sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobbs, T. (1381) Leviathan, translated by Hossein Bashirieh, Tehran: Ney Publishing, 2nd edition.] In Persian [
Jones, W. T. (1358). Masters of Political Thought (Volume II, Part I), translated by Ali Ramin, Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing, first edition.] In Persian [
Kalmo, H. & Skinner, Q. (2010). “Introduction: A Concept in Fragments”, In Hent Kalmo & Quentin Skinner (Ed). Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present, and Future of a Contested Concept, (pp.1-26), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
Kalyvas, A. (2008). Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelsen, H. (1391). The Pure Theory of Law, translated by Esmaeil Nematollahi, Tehran: Samt Publication] In Persian [
Laughlin, M. (1388). Fundamentals of Public Law, translated by Mohammad Rasakh, Tehran: Nay Publishing, first edition.] In Persian [
Lock, J. (1392). Two Treatises of Government, translated by Farshad Shariat, Tehran: Negah Moaser Publishing, first edition. ] In Persian [
Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatises of Government, Edited by Peter Laslett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maritain, J. (1951). Man and the State, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morris, C. (1998). An essay on the Modern State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nicholls, D. (1989). Deity and Domination; Images of God and the State in the Nineteenth and Twentieth, United Kingdom:
Pan, D. (2019). “State, Movement, People: Representation and Race in the Construction of Political Identity,” Telos, No. 189, pp. 87-108
Philpott, D. (2016). “Sovereignty”, In. Edward N. Zalta (Ed). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Available at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/sovereignty/>.
Runciman, D. (2003). “The Concept of the State: The Sovereignty of a Fiction”, In Quentin Skinner & Bo Strath (Ed). States and Citizens: History, Theory, Perospec, (pp.28-38), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, C. (2008) Constitutional Theory, Translated and edited by Jeffrey Seitzer, Durham: Duke University Press.
Schmitt, C. (1393-A). Political Theology: Four Chapters in the Concept of Sovereignty, Introduction by George Schwab, English translator, translated by Leila Chamankhah, Tehran: Negah Moasar Publishing, 2nd edition.] In Persian [
Schmitt, C. (1393-B). The Concept of the Political, translated by Yashar Jirani, & Raasool Namazi, Tehran: Qoqnoos Publications, first edition.] In Persian [
Schmitt, C. (1395). The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol, translated by Shervin Moghimi Zanjani, Tehran: Pegah Rozgar Nou Cultural Institute, first edition. In Persian [
Schupmann, B. A. (2015). Leviathan Run Aground: Carl Schmitt’s State Theory and Militant Democracy, Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, 2015, Available at:<https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac:205773>.
Seitzer, F. & Thornhill, C. (2008). “An Introduction to Carl Schmitt’s Constitutional Theory: Issues and Context”, in Schmitt, C. (2008). Constitutional Theory, Translated by Jeffrey Seitzer, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 11-51
Skinner, Q, (1381), “State in Contemporary Political Philosophy”, In Robert Godin & Philip Pettit, (Ed). In State and Society, (pp.1-79), translated by Moosa Akrami, Tehran: Printing and Publication Center of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, first edition.] In Persian [
Skinner, Q. (1999). “Hobbes and Purely Artificial Person of the State”, TheJournal of Political Philosophy, Volume 7, No 1, 1-29.
Skinner, Q. (2009). “A Genealogy of the Modern State”, Proceedings of the British Academy, 162, pp.325-370.
Skinner, Q. (2010). “The Sovereign State: A Genealogy”, In Hent Kalmo & Quentin Skinner (Ed). Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept, (pp.26-46), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, Q. (1393). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Volume 2. The Age of Reformation, translated by Kazem Firouzmand, Tehran: Agah Publications, first edition.] In Persian [
Troper, M. (2010). “The Survival of Sovereignty”, In Hent Kalmo & Quentin Skinner (Ed). Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept, (pp.132-150), Cambridge University Press.
Van Creveld, M. (1999). The Rise and Decline of the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vincent, A. (1371) Theories of the State, translated by Hossein Bashirieh, H., Tehran: Ney Publishing, first edition.] In Persian [
Vinx, l. (2016). “Carl Schmitt”, In. Edward N. Zalta (Ed). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Available at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/sovereignty/>.
Voegelin, (2001). “Review of Verfassungslehre by Carl Schmitt (1931)”, In Jodi Cockerill & Barry Cooper (Ed). The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, Volume 13: Selected Book Reviews, University of Missouri Press, pp.42-66.
Wolff, R. P. (1990). The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Zucca, L. (2015). “A Genealogy of State Sovereignty”, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, Volume. 16, No 2, pp.398-422.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 November 2023
  • Revise Date: 16 January 2024
  • Accept Date: 19 February 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics